Case study:The Taw River Improvement Project (TRIP): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location |
Revision as of 16:12, 5 September 2013
Location: 51° 4' 37.97" N, 4° 9' 59.63" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Laurence |
Main contact surname | Couldrick |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | North Devon Biosphere Reserve, Westcountry Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wrt.org.uk/ |
Partner organisations | Farming and Wildlife Group South West, Devon Wildlife Trust, Silvanus |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
TRIP is a partnership project that will use CRF funds to manage restoration work to deliver habitat improvements in the Taw catchment. The partnership, led by the Westcountry Rivers Trust, has been carrying out river restoration and addressing the causes of Water Framework Directive issues together for many years.
The outcomes of the project are the following:
- Water quality management – More con-sistent supply of better water quality;
- Improved biodiversity - increased hab-itat biodiversity and renaturalisation;
- Social - Improved leisure environment for angling and recreation;
- Economic - Improved fisheries and spawning for commercial stocks;
- Flood attenuation and management - Increased wetted and wooded areas; Counteract climate change - Carbon sequestration through wetland sinks.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Site
Name | Taw river catchment |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | Intensive agriculture (arable) |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 1000 - 5000 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 23322,332 k€ <br />2,332,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Catchment Restoration Funds |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Marginal planting, Gravel augmentation |
Floodplain / River corridor | Creation of a flood expansion area |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | Improved leisure environment for angling and recreation |
Other | Participation in works |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information