Case study:River Marden at Calne: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location |
Revision as of 16:00, 5 September 2013
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Paul |
Main contact surname | Jolliffe |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Nicholas Pearson Associates |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.npaconsult.co.uk/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Following the demolition of a town centre factory, the River Marden through Calne flowed in a straight concrete channel and two small weirs barred the passage of fish. Urban regeneration, and the resultant redevelopment of the site, meant that the river had to be diverted south of its existing course and the opportunity was taken to improve the character of the river and create a public amenity.
The diversion was undertaken in the form of a double meander so that natural geomorphological features such as shoals, riffles and pools could be incorporated, along with public access to the river and the creation of a variety of sustainable, attractive habitats for flora and fauna.
The scheme has been a success and the river is now a focal point of the town and the centerpiece for the towns annual duck race!
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | River Marden at Calne |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB109053022060 |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Straightened, Artificial bed |
Reference morphology | Bedrock cascade, Sinuous |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | Chalk |
River corridor land use | Urban |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 100100 m <br />0.1 km <br />10,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 1999/03/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | 1999/09/30 |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Supplementary funding information
Exact costs for the project are not available but would have been "considerable" given the works required
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Bedrock cascades and outcrops, Creation of pools and riffles, Creation of shoals/berms |
Floodplain / River corridor | Public access to the river |
Planform / Channel pattern | Remeandering, weir removal |
Other | Replacement existing culvert with twin culvert |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | Improved public access, Focal point for local events |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Fish | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|---|
http://www.therrc.co.uk/pdf/manual/MAN 1 5.pdf | RRC Manual of River Restoration Techniques entry - Creation of meandering channel and replacement of concrete weirs |
http://www.therrc.co.uk/pdf/manual/MAN 5 4.pdf | RRC Manual of River Restoration Techniques entry - Installation of simulated bedrock outcrops |
http://www.therrc.co.uk/pdf/manual/MAN 8 5.pdf | RRC Manual of River Restoration Techniques entry - Urban riverside access |
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information