Case study:Highland Water at Warwickslade Lawn: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 55: Line 55:
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=2009 10 14 (11).JPG
|Caption=Addition of woody debris to the river to significantly reduce flow velocities, October 2009
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=2009 10 14 (16).JPG
|Caption=To avoid damage to the site in construction, a minature railway track was created to transport materials and machinery. October 2009
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}

Revision as of 13:44, 17 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 51' 28.12" N, 1° 36' 31.52" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Re-meandering of the restored river

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


As part of a EU Life project there was a programme of habitat restoration in SSSIs, into which the Highland Water at Warwickslade fell. The project looked to return the river to it's historical course (determined through the study of historical maps), including re-meandering. A number of work measures were undertaken to reduce the speed of the flow, subsequently reducing bank erosion, and to improve the habitat quality.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district South East
River basin New Forest

Subcatchment

River name Highland Water
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 121121 m <br />0.121 km <br />12,100 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Broadleaved Woodland
Waterbody ID GB107042016720



Other case studies in this subcatchment: New Forest LIFE project


Site

Edit site
Name Highland Water
WFD water body codes GB107042016720
WFD (national) typology Low, Small, Siliceous
WFD water body name Highland Water
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 3000 m3 km <br />300,000 cm <br />
Project started 2009/06/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2009/11/01
Total cost category 1 - 10 k€
Total cost (k€) 4 k€4,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Gravel placement, Planting
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Re-meandering
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Addition of woody debris to the river to significantly reduce flow velocities, October 2009
To avoid damage to the site in construction, a minature railway track was created to transport materials and machinery. October 2009


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description
http://www.therrc.co.uk/case studies/highland%20water%20at%20warwickslade%20lawn.pdf River Restoration Centre Case Study

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information