Case study:River Dee: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
        
        
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=Complete
   
|Themes=Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Spatial planning
   
|Country=England
      Complete
|Main contact forename=Nick
|Project web site url=
|Main contact surname=Elbourne
     
|Main contact id=NickRRC
|Themes=
|Contact organisation=River Restoration Centre
      Spatial planning,Economic aspects,Habitat and biodiversity,Monitoring,Hydromorphology,Land use management - agriculture
|Contact organisation url=www.therrc.co.uk
|Country=
|Partner organisations=River Dee Trust,
      England
|Multi-site=No
|Main contact forename=
     
|Main contact surname=
     
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      River Dee Trust
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment

Revision as of 08:35, 17 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Spatial planning
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations River Dee Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Subcatchment:Dee


Site

Edit site
Name Dee Restoration
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel
Reference morphology Sinuous, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off, Groundwater
Dominant substrate Gravel, Cobble
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Abstraction, Reservoir impoundment
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Flow velocities, Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Species composition, Fish: Abundance
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Fisheries


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Planting, Introduction of spawning gravels, Regrading
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Introduction of Sinuosity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Information provision, Consultation, Participation in design


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information