Case study:River Cole- Life Project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}} | {{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{ | {{Other responses header}} | ||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Public perceptions | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents}} | {{Monitoring_documents}} |
Revision as of 15:22, 15 August 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 38' 22.09" N, 1° 39' 46.08" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Martin |
Main contact surname | Janes |
Main contact user ID | User:NickRRC |
Contact organisation | River Restoration Centre |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.therrc.co.uk |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, National Trust, Countryside Commission, English Nature |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | |
---|---|
River basin | Humber |
Subcatchment
River name | River Cole |
---|---|
Area category | |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | |
Ecoregion | |
Dominant land cover | |
Waterbody ID |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: The River Cole and Tyseley Energy Park: Creation of Community Commons
Site
Name | River Cole |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB106039023730 |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | Cole (Bower Bridge to Thames) including Coleshill |
Pre-project morphology | Straight, Single channel |
Reference morphology | Sinuous |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | Bedrock, Boulders, Gravel |
River corridor land use | Extensive agriculture |
Average bankfull channel width category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | 0.5 - 2 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | 0.0008 |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 2000 m2 km <br />200,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 1996/08/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | 1996/12/31 |
Total cost category | 100 - 500 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 175 k€175,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Planting, Depth modification |
Floodplain / River corridor | Floodplain spillways |
Planform / Channel pattern | Introduction of sinuosity, Creation of secondary channel, Backwaters created |
Other | Livestock access, New crossings |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Invertebrates | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement | ||
Fish: Species composition | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Public perceptions | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Improvement |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|