Case study:Rother meander reconnection: Difference between revisions
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{ | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Invertebrates | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Inconclusive | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=Yes | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Macrophytes | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}} | {{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}} |
Revision as of 15:02, 9 August 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.therrc.co.uk/rrc_case_studies1.php?csid=59 |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Nick |
Main contact surname | Elbourne |
Main contact user ID | User:NickRRC |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Shopham Loop is a section of the river Rother, West Sussex between Coultershaw Bridge and Shopham Bridge. A cut was created in the 18th century to bypass the meander and enable passage of boats upstream. However after navigation ceased, the locks were removed and the cut became the main river course with the meander (Shopham Loop) remaining as a backwater. Land use change to an intensive agricultural regime in turn led to shallower soils and increased siltation and the loop entrance became blocked with deposits preventing any flow from the Rother.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Site
Name | Shopham Loop |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB107041012810 |
WFD (national) typology | Low, Medium, Calcareous |
WFD water body name | Western Rother |
Pre-project morphology | Single channel, High width:depth, Embanked |
Reference morphology | Sinuous |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | Silt, Gravel |
River corridor land use | Urban, Intensive agriculture |
Average bankfull channel width category | 5 - 10 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | 4.974.97 m³/s <br />4,970 l/s <br /> |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 1000 m1 km <br />100,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2000/03/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2004/09/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | 580 k€580,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Re-grading, Creation of stone riffle, Planting |
Floodplain / River corridor | Restore and improve floodplain connection, Creation of backwater and ponds |
Planform / Channel pattern | Re-instatment of old course, Protect old lock from erosion |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Structure & condition of riparian zones | Yes | Yes | Improvement | |||
Channel pattern/planform | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Invertebrates | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Inconclusive |
Fish | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Macrophytes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|---|
http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GESO0910BSTC-E-E.pdf | Environment Agency WFD Classification - See P.190. |
http://www.therrc.co.uk/case studies/rother%20at%20shopham%20loop%20final.pdf | RRC Case Study - Shopham Loop |