Case study:RSPB Fowlmere Nature Reserve: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name= | |Name=Fowlmere Nature Reserve | ||
|WFD water body code=GB105033038080 | |||
|WFD water body name=Shep | |||
|Pre-project morphology=High width:depth,Single channel,Straight | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Reference morphology=Sinuous,Pool-riffle | ||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|WFD water body name= | |Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off | ||
|Dominant substrate=Silt,Sand | |||
|Pre-project morphology= | |River corridor land use=Grassland | ||
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m | |||
|Reference morphology= | |Average bankfull channel depth category=2 - 5 m | ||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
|Dominant hydrology= | |||
|Dominant substrate= | |||
|River corridor land use= | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category= | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background |
Revision as of 16:23, 8 August 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 52° 5' 26.27" N, 0° 2' 59.69" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://therrc.co.uk/rrc_case_studies1.php?csid=65 |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rob |
Main contact surname | Mungovan |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Anglian |
---|---|
River basin | Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level) |
Subcatchment
River name | Shep |
---|---|
Area category | 10 - 100 km² |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | 100 - 200 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | 167167 m <br />0.167 km <br />16,700 cm <br /> |
Dominant geology | Calcareous |
Ecoregion | Great Britain |
Dominant land cover | Arable and Horticulture |
Waterbody ID | GB105033038080 |
Site
Name | Fowlmere Nature Reserve |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB105033038080 |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | Shep |
Pre-project morphology | High width:depth, Single channel, Straight |
Reference morphology | Sinuous, Pool-riffle |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Quick run-off |
Dominant substrate | Silt, Sand |
River corridor land use | Grassland |
Average bankfull channel width category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 600 m0.6 km <br />60,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2006/03/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2009/12/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 10 - 50 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 14 k€14,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Environment Agency |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Cut back of plants, Riffle creation, Placement of log steps to prevent erosion from deer, Bed raising, Placement of faggots |
Floodplain / River corridor | Riparian enhancement |
Planform / Channel pattern | Increase in sinuosity, Narrowing of channel |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | Easier management |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Width & depth variation | Yes | Yes | Improvement | |||
Quantity & dynamics of flow | Yes | Yes | Improvement | |||
Substrate conditions | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Fish: Abundance | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement | |
Invertebrates | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement | ||
Macrophytes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Public awareness of river | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|