Case study:RSPB Fowlmere Nature Reserve: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|Name=Fowlmere Nature Reserve
   
|WFD water body code=GB105033038080
   
|WFD water body name=Shep
      Fowlmere Nature Reserve
|Pre-project morphology=High width:depth,Single channel,Straight
|WFD water body code=
|Reference morphology=Sinuous,Pool-riffle
     
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|WFD (national) typology=
|Protected species present=No
     
|Invasive species present=No
|WFD water body name=
|Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off
     
|Dominant substrate=Silt,Sand
|Pre-project morphology=
|River corridor land use=Grassland
      High width:depth,Single channel,Straight
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m
|Reference morphology=
|Average bankfull channel depth category=2 - 5 m
      Sinuous,Pool-riffle
|Heavily modified water body=
      true
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
      Quick run-off
|Dominant substrate=
      Silt,Sand
|River corridor land use=
      Grassland
|Average bankfull channel width category=
      2 - 5 m
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
      2 - 5 m
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project background
{{Project background

Revision as of 16:23, 8 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 5' 26.27" N, 0° 2' 59.69" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://therrc.co.uk/rrc_case_studies1.php?csid=65
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Mungovan
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Environment Agency
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level)

Subcatchment

River name Shep
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 167167 m <br />0.167 km <br />16,700 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105033038080



Site

Edit site
Name Fowlmere Nature Reserve
WFD water body codes GB105033038080
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Shep
Pre-project morphology High width:depth, Single channel, Straight
Reference morphology Sinuous, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Silt, Sand
River corridor land use Grassland
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 600 m0.6 km <br />60,000 cm <br />
Project started 2006/03/01
Works started
Works completed 2009/12/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 14 k€14,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Substrate conditions
Biology Fish: Abundance, Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Nature development, Recreation


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Cut back of plants, Riffle creation, Placement of log steps to prevent erosion from deer, Bed raising, Placement of faggots
Floodplain / River corridor Riparian enhancement
Planform / Channel pattern Increase in sinuosity, Narrowing of channel
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Easier management
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Width & depth variation Yes Yes Improvement
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Improvement
Substrate conditions Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Macrophytes Yes Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Public awareness of river Yes Yes Yes Improvement


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information