Case study:RSPB Fowlmere Nature Reserve: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 78: Line 78:
        
        
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Reach length directly affected=600 m
   
|Project started=2006/03/01
   
|Works completed=2009/12/01
      600 m
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€
|Project started=
|Total1 cost=14 k€
      2006/03/01
|Funding sources=Environment Agency
|Works started=
     
|Works completed=
      2009/12/01
|Project completed=
     
|Total cost category=
      10 - 50 k€
|Total1 cost=
      14 k€
|Funding sources=
     
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations

Revision as of 16:13, 8 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 5' 26.27" N, 0° 2' 59.69" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://therrc.co.uk/rrc_case_studies1.php?csid=65
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Mungovan
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level)

Subcatchment

River name Shep
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 167167 m <br />0.167 km <br />16,700 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105033038080



Site

Edit site
Name Fowlmere Nature Reserve
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology High width:depth, Single channel, Straight
Reference morphology Sinuous, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Silt, Sand
River corridor land use Grassland
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 600 m0.6 km <br />60,000 cm <br />
Project started 2006/03/01
Works started
Works completed 2009/12/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 14 k€14,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Substrate conditions
Biology Fish: Abundance, Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Nature development, Recreation


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Cut back of plants, Riffle creation, Placement of log steps to prevent erosion from deer, Bed raising, Placement of faggots
Floodplain / River corridor Riparian enhancement
Planform / Channel pattern Increase in sinuosity, Narrowing of channel
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Easier management
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Width & depth variation Yes Yes Improvement
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Improvement
Substrate conditions Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Macrophytes Yes Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Public awareness of river Yes Yes Yes Improvement


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information