Case study:The Taw River Improvement Project (TRIP): Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
}}
}}
{{Project background
{{Project background
|Total cost category=1000 - 5000 k€
|Total1 cost=2332
|Funding sources=Catchment Restoration Funds
|Funding sources=Catchment Restoration Funds
}}
}}

Revision as of 09:12, 6 June 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 4' 37.97" N, 4° 9' 59.63" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Laurence
Main contact surname Couldrick
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation North Devon Biosphere Reserve, Westcountry Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.wrt.org.uk/
Partner organisations Farming and Wildlife Group South West, Devon Wildlife Trust, Silvanus
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


TRIP is a partnership project that will use CRF funds to manage restoration work to deliver habitat improvements in the Taw catchment. The partnership, led by the Westcountry Rivers Trust, has been carrying out river restoration and addressing the causes of Water Framework Directive issues together for many years. The outcomes of the project are the following: Water quality management – More con-sistent supply of better water quality; Improved biodiversity - increased hab-itat biodiversity and renaturalisation; Social - Improved leisure environment for angling and recreation; Economic - Improved fisheries and spawning for commercial stocks; Flood attenuation and management - Increased wetted and wooded areas; Counteract climate change - Carbon sequestration through wetland sinks.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Subcatchment:Taw


Site

Edit site
Name Taw river catchment
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€) 23322,332 k€ <br />2,332,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Catchment Restoration Funds

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Structure & condition of riparian zones
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Economic, Social, Climate change mitigation


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Marginal planting, Gravel augmentation
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of a flood expansion area
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Improved leisure environment for angling and recreation
Other Participation in works


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information