Case study:River Quaggy- Chinbrook meadows: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 271: | Line 271: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | {{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | ||
{{ | {{Supplementary Information | ||
|Information= | |Information=You can view this project on the FORECASTER database: [[http://forecaster.deltares.nl/index.php?title=Category:Case_studies]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} |
Revision as of 15:37, 3 August 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Dave |
Main contact surname | Webb |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | QWAG, Lewisham Council |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project is an excellent example of a partnership initiative that has not only restored the river and floodplain, but has also paid careful attention to improving the park amenities. The channel work was completed in spring 2002 and by September that year there had already been considerable movement of gravels. Natural geomorphological features including a pool/riffle sequence, gravel bars and steeper banks had formed. The pond has been colonised by invertebrates and the vegetation planted along the banks is now providing good cover in both the planted and unplanted sections.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Site
Name | River Quaggy |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Straight, Revetments |
Reference morphology | Sinuous |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | true |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated, Quick run-off |
Dominant substrate | Bedrock |
River corridor land use | Urban |
Average bankfull channel width category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | 0.5 - 2 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | 0.3 |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 300 m0.3 km <br />30,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2002/03/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2002/10/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | 100 k€100,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Environment Agency |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Removal of revetments, Introduction of gravels, Planting of native species |
Floodplain / River corridor | Removal of embankments, Creation of wetlands, Creation of ponds |
Planform / Channel pattern | Introduction of sinuosity |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other | Information provision, Consultation |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Invertebrates | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement | ||
Macrophytes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|---|
http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinbrook Meadows | Wikipedia link |
http://http://www.therrc.co.uk/case studies/chinbrook meadows.pdf | RRC site description |
http://www.qwag.org.uk/quaggy/restoration.php | Quaggy Waterways Action Plan link |
http://http://www.greenchain.com/learning/sites/chinbrook-meadows.php | Green chain link |
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information
You can view this project on the FORECASTER database: [[1]]