Case study:Upper Cringle Floodplain Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
LincsRivers (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
LincsRivers (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|Average channel gradient category=0.001 - 0.01 | |Average channel gradient category=0.001 - 0.01 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected=1000 | |||
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | |||
|Total1 cost=98 | |||
|Benefit to cost ratio=2.97 | |||
|Funding sources=Environment Agency, | |||
|Investigation and design cost category=10 - 50 k€ | |||
|Invst and design cost=14 | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Lincolnshire Rivers Trust | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Gail | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Talton | |||
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Lincolnshire Rivers Trust | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Gail | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Talton | |||
|Works1 and supervision cost category=50 - 100 k€ | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost=84 | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Lincolnshire Rivers Trust | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Gail | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Talton | |||
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Lincolnshire Rivers Trust | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Gail | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Talton | |||
|Monitoring1 cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Lincolnshire Rivers Trust | |||
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Gail | |||
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Talton | |||
|Supplementary funding information=Works were paid for by a Water Environment Improvement Fund Grant and land was contributed to the project by the landowner. | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} |
Revision as of 12:53, 10 May 2022
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 52° 49' 29.40" N, 0° 38' 55.40" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Gail |
Main contact surname | Talton |
Main contact user ID | User:LincsRivers |
Contact organisation | Lincolnshire Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://lincsrivers.org.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationWorks were paid for by a Water Environment Improvement Fund Grant and land was contributed to the project by the landowner.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|