Case study:Glaisdale Beck Restoration Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
|Main contact forename=Alex
|Main contact forename=Alex
|Main contact surname=Cripps
|Main contact surname=Cripps
|Contact organisation=Yorkshire Esk Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation=Yorkshire Esk Rivers Trust and North York Moors National Park Authority
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=Glaisdale Bekc faced many pressures, predominantly fine sedimentation, nutrient and organic matter enrichment.  This project will work towards achieving good ecological status by 2021.
|Project summary=Glaisdale Bekc faced many pressures, predominantly fine sedimentation, nutrient and organic matter enrichment.  This project will work towards achieving good ecological status by 2021.

Revision as of 17:00, 10 January 2017

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 25' 21.47" N, 0° 50' 11.36" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Alex
Main contact surname Cripps
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Yorkshire Esk Rivers Trust and North York Moors National Park Authority
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Glaisdale Bekc faced many pressures, predominantly fine sedimentation, nutrient and organic matter enrichment. This project will work towards achieving good ecological status by 2021. The main objectives for the Glaisdale Beck Restoration Project are: 1. Engage with key farms: between 7-10 farms 2. One-to-one farm advice (Water Friendly Farming): at 7-10 farms 3. Erect riverside fencing and create buffer strips: ~2km of riparian fencing and associated buffer strips 4. Install infrastructure improvements such as watering points and tracks 5. Tree planting: 200+ 6. Large woody debris (materials for multiple sites): at 2+ sites 7. Coppicing (two man days with tractor): at 2 sites 8. Small-scale bank stabilisation (materials for multiple sites): at 2+ sites

Improvement works are focused on reducing the source of fine sediment, nutrients and bacterial loading primarily by addressing stretches of Glaisdale Beck (and associated ditch networks) where degraded habitat and large areas of poached bank sides were evident. Improvement works included: erecting livestock fencing to prevent access to Glaisdale Beck (and associated ditches), creating buffer strips to filter surface runoff by promoting natural re-vegetation and reducing bank erosion, providing alternative livestock watering points, addressing poached crossing points and planting trees to help create a riparian woodland corridor. The Catchment Partnership Officer's role was to work closely with local land managers, draw up and deliver works, and also work closely with the local Catchment Sensitive Farming (CSF) Officer to ensure the Glaisdale Beck Restoration Project worked alongside the new Countryside Stewardship Scheme.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2016/05/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information