Case study:Hampton Court Palace: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Home Park Water Meadows | |Name of parent multi-site project=Home Park Water Meadows | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Reedbed creation, profiling of river bank, tree management, installation of eel passes and stocking of fish in adjacent ponds at Hampton Court Palace, Home Park Paddocks. Main reasons for enhancement were habitat creation, landscape and aesthetics. Riverbank enhancement, and potential to demonstrate traditional management methods with modern knowledge and technology to show improvement to flood meadow function and water quality. | |Project summary=Reedbed creation, profiling of river bank, tree management, installation of eel passes and stocking of fish in adjacent ponds at Hampton Court Palace, Home Park Paddocks. Main reasons for enhancement were habitat creation, landscape and aesthetics. Riverbank enhancement, and potential to demonstrate traditional management methods with modern knowledge and technology to show improvement to flood meadow function and water quality. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Monitoring of nitrates and phosphates and surveying of wildlife on going. To be undertaken by Historic Royal Palace Staff, local conservation groups, volutneers, and local community trained by Thames21. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Monitoring and surveying on going. To be undertaken by Historic Royal Palace Staff, local conservation groups, volutneers, and local community trained by Thames21. | |||
|Lessons learn=Project timing is essential to maximize benefit. When to cut vegetation, when to plant, what time is best to carry out re-profiling to limit disturbance,when it is best to work with local communites, schools in particular and those with more fixed schedules, and the fact that projects must be allowed to be flexible enough to alter perimeters should the need arise within these timings. | |Lessons learn=Project timing is essential to maximize benefit. When to cut vegetation, when to plant, what time is best to carry out re-profiling to limit disturbance,when it is best to work with local communites, schools in particular and those with more fixed schedules, and the fact that projects must be allowed to be flexible enough to alter perimeters should the need arise within these timings. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} |
Revision as of 13:35, 22 July 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rebecca |
Main contact surname | Law |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://http://thames-landscape-strategy.org.uk/what-we-do/projects/ |
Partner organisations | Thames Landscape Strategy; Thames 21; Historic Royal Palaces |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Reedbed creation, profiling of river bank, tree management, installation of eel passes and stocking of fish in adjacent ponds at Hampton Court Palace, Home Park Paddocks. Main reasons for enhancement were habitat creation, landscape and aesthetics. Riverbank enhancement, and potential to demonstrate traditional management methods with modern knowledge and technology to show improvement to flood meadow function and water quality.
Monitoring surveys and results
Monitoring of nitrates and phosphates and surveying of wildlife on going. To be undertaken by Historic Royal Palace Staff, local conservation groups, volutneers, and local community trained by Thames21.
Lessons learnt
Project timing is essential to maximize benefit. When to cut vegetation, when to plant, what time is best to carry out re-profiling to limit disturbance,when it is best to work with local communites, schools in particular and those with more fixed schedules, and the fact that projects must be allowed to be flexible enough to alter perimeters should the need arise within these timings.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Broom Road Recreation Ground, Chertsey meads, Hurst Park, Teddington Wharf, The Barge Walk, Hampton Court
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|