Case study:Sediment Pathways Project: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.280825105440165, -1.4601168036460876 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Sediment Pathways Project |Stat...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Land use management - agriculture, Water quality | |Themes=Land use management - agriculture, Water quality | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Ali | |Main contact forename=Ali | ||
|Main contact surname=Morse | |Main contact surname=Morse | ||
|Contact organisation=Test & Itchen Catchment Partnership | |Contact organisation=Test & Itchen Catchment Partnership | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.ticp.org.uk | |Contact organisation url=www.ticp.org.uk | ||
|Partner organisations=Wessex Chalkstreams & Rivers Trust & Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (Catchment Partnership hosting organisations) | |||
|Multi-site=Yes | |Multi-site=Yes | ||
|Project picture=DSC02462 copy.jpg | |||
|Picture description=Constructing cross drain on farm track | |||
|Project summary=The ‘Sediment Pathways Project’ aims to reduce the existing high levels of fine sediment entering watercourses, via roads, tracks and pathways, within two pilot sub-catchments (Bourne Rivulet & Cheriton Stream) of the Test and Itchen catchment. | |||
The project builds upon the Environment Agency’s ‘Rural Sediment Tracing Project’ (RSTP), which identified and classified catchment sources of fine sediment inputs to streams and rivers within 11 priority catchments, including the Test & Itchen. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Baseline data was collected as part of the Environment Agency’s Rural Sediment Tracing Project investigations. This data showed suspended solid loads in mg/l at five of the project sites. For each site, three readings were collected; upstream of inflow, at the inflow and downstream of inflow. | |||
After completion of the project works, further samples have been collected and the suspended solid readings have been compared with the baseline data. Comparison of the baseline data with the post project work data demonstrates that the mitigation measures have been effective at reducing inputs of fine sediment at all of the sites. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} |
Revision as of 16:01, 4 April 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Land use management - agriculture, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Ali |
Main contact surname | Morse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Test & Itchen Catchment Partnership |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.ticp.org.uk |
Partner organisations | Wessex Chalkstreams & Rivers Trust & Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (Catchment Partnership hosting organisations) |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
Project summary
The ‘Sediment Pathways Project’ aims to reduce the existing high levels of fine sediment entering watercourses, via roads, tracks and pathways, within two pilot sub-catchments (Bourne Rivulet & Cheriton Stream) of the Test and Itchen catchment.
The project builds upon the Environment Agency’s ‘Rural Sediment Tracing Project’ (RSTP), which identified and classified catchment sources of fine sediment inputs to streams and rivers within 11 priority catchments, including the Test & Itchen.
Monitoring surveys and results
Baseline data was collected as part of the Environment Agency’s Rural Sediment Tracing Project investigations. This data showed suspended solid loads in mg/l at five of the project sites. For each site, three readings were collected; upstream of inflow, at the inflow and downstream of inflow.
After completion of the project works, further samples have been collected and the suspended solid readings have been compared with the baseline data. Comparison of the baseline data with the post project work data demonstrates that the mitigation measures have been effective at reducing inputs of fine sediment at all of the sites.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|