Case study:Sediment Pathways Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.280825105440165, -1.4601168036460876 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Sediment Pathways Project |Stat...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Sediment Pathways Project
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
|Themes=Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Ali  
|Main contact forename=Ali
|Main contact surname=Morse
|Main contact surname=Morse
|Contact organisation=Test & Itchen Catchment Partnership
|Contact organisation=Test & Itchen Catchment Partnership
|Contact organisation url=www.ticp.org.uk
|Contact organisation url=www.ticp.org.uk
|Partner organisations=Wessex Chalkstreams & Rivers Trust & Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (Catchment Partnership hosting organisations)
|Multi-site=Yes
|Multi-site=Yes
|Project picture=DSC02462 copy.jpg
|Picture description=Constructing cross drain on farm track
|Project summary=The ‘Sediment Pathways Project’ aims to reduce the existing high levels of fine sediment entering watercourses, via roads, tracks and pathways, within two pilot sub-catchments (Bourne Rivulet & Cheriton Stream) of the Test and Itchen catchment.
The project builds upon the Environment Agency’s ‘Rural Sediment Tracing Project’ (RSTP), which identified and classified catchment sources of fine sediment inputs to streams and rivers within 11 priority catchments, including the Test & Itchen.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Baseline data was collected as part of the Environment Agency’s Rural Sediment Tracing Project investigations. This data showed suspended solid loads in mg/l at five of the project sites. For each site, three readings were collected; upstream of inflow, at the inflow and downstream of inflow. 
After completion of the project works, further samples have been collected and the suspended solid readings have been compared with the baseline data. Comparison of the baseline data with the post project work data demonstrates that the mitigation measures have been effective at reducing inputs of fine sediment at all of the sites.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 16:01, 4 April 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 16' 50.97" N, 1° 27' 36.42" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Ali
Main contact surname Morse
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Test & Itchen Catchment Partnership
Contact organisation web site http://www.ticp.org.uk
Partner organisations Wessex Chalkstreams & Rivers Trust & Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (Catchment Partnership hosting organisations)
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Constructing cross drain on farm track

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The ‘Sediment Pathways Project’ aims to reduce the existing high levels of fine sediment entering watercourses, via roads, tracks and pathways, within two pilot sub-catchments (Bourne Rivulet & Cheriton Stream) of the Test and Itchen catchment.

The project builds upon the Environment Agency’s ‘Rural Sediment Tracing Project’ (RSTP), which identified and classified catchment sources of fine sediment inputs to streams and rivers within 11 priority catchments, including the Test & Itchen.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Baseline data was collected as part of the Environment Agency’s Rural Sediment Tracing Project investigations. This data showed suspended solid loads in mg/l at five of the project sites. For each site, three readings were collected; upstream of inflow, at the inflow and downstream of inflow.

After completion of the project works, further samples have been collected and the suspended solid readings have been compared with the baseline data. Comparison of the baseline data with the post project work data demonstrates that the mitigation measures have been effective at reducing inputs of fine sediment at all of the sites.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information