Case study:Gunville Phase I: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Partner organisations=Environment Agency, Natural England, Wessex Water, Wiltshire Fishery Association, | |Partner organisations=Environment Agency, Natural England, Wessex Water, Wiltshire Fishery Association, | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Strategic Framework for Restoration of the River Avon (SFfRRA) | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Strategic Framework for Restoration of the River Avon (SFfRRA) | ||
|Multi-site= | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=P6080078.JPG | |Project picture=P6080078.JPG | ||
|Picture description=Gunville Phase I | |Picture description=Gunville Phase I |
Revision as of 12:00, 17 February 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Martijn |
Main contact surname | Antheunisse |
Main contact user ID | User:Martijnantheunisse |
Contact organisation | Wiltshire Wildlife Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wiltshirewildlife.org |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, Natural England, Wessex Water, Wiltshire Fishery Association |
Parent multi-site project |
Case_study:Strategic Framework for Restoration of the River Avon (SFfRRA) |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Commissioned by Wiltshire Wildlife Trust and funded through a successful Catchment Restoration Fund bid, Cain Bioengineering submitted a very professional interpretation for the 750m stretch of river, incorporating a mixture of geotextile and earth back-fill berms, brushwood sediment traps, gravel riffles, large woody debris and live tree hinging. The general theme of the works was remeandering, channel narrowing and bank regrading. The creation of off-line ponds provided fill for the geotextile berms and created valuable riparian habitat. Due to the nature of the site and the partners involved (being part of the MoD training estate, with fishing rights given to theServicesDry Fly Fishing Association (SDFFA)), stakeholder consultation was crucial in the on-going development of the project. As a result of this consultation and mitigation for Water vole (Arvicola terrestris), designs had to be adapted several times during the project, leading to a bespoke, dynamic restoration which should be readily able to withstand the variety of pressures faced by the river.
Monitoring surveys and results
Monitoring consists of invertebrate surveys, electro-fish surveys and fixed-point photography. Data was collected throughout 2013 and 2014 through volunteer effort. Results have yet to be analysed.
Lessons learnt
Future projects should incorporate time for delays such as flooding, water vole mitigation and other
potential difficulties.
Despite not being public land, improved communications with local residents would have made
progress much smoother.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Longstreet A 91a, River Avon Habitat Enhancement, Fifield, River Avon at East Chisenbury, West Amesbury
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|