Case study:Short Heath Brook Project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Bleak Hill Recreation Ground | |Name=Bleak Hill Recreation Ground | ||
|WFD water body code= | |WFD water body code=n/a | ||
|Pre-project morphology=Straightened, Artificial channel, | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Straightened, Artificial channel, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |Heavily modified water body=Yes | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |Invasive species present=Yes | ||
|Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off, | |Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off, | ||
|Dominant substrate=Silt, | |Dominant substrate=Silt, | ||
|River corridor land use=Parklands garden, | |River corridor land use=Parklands garden, | ||
|Average bankfull channel width category=Less than 2 m | |Average bankfull channel width category=Less than 2 m | ||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=Less than 0.5 m | |Average bankfull channel depth category=Less than 0.5 m |
Revision as of 11:53, 20 November 2015
Location: 52° 31' 44.13" N, 1° 51' 9.35" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Social benefits, Water quality, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Will |
Main contact surname | Groves |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | Birmingham City Council/ Witton Lodge Community Assoication/ Friends of Witton Lakes |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: River Tame at Salford Park ("SMURF"), River Tame in Perry Hall playing fields ("SMURF"), SMURF Tame
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|