Case study:Gategill Beck: Abandoned Metal Mines: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location}} {{Project overview |Project title=Gategill Beck: Abandoned Metal Mines |Status=In progress |Themes=Environmental flo...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Location}}
{{Location}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Gategill Beck: Abandoned Metal Mines
|Status=In progress
|Status=In progress
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Line 11: Line 10:
|Main contact surname=Potter
|Main contact surname=Potter
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Partner organisations=The Coal Authority (UK),
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=The Threlkeld mine was worked for lead and zinc between 1661 and 1928. The mine has a long history of causing pollution and fish kills, and the owners were first prosecuted in 1890. The mine is a significant source of heavy metal pollution, particularly cadmium and zinc, in Gategill Beck and the River Glenderamackin, which fails to achieve 'Good' status for the Water Framework Directive. The metal pollution also affects the River Derwent and Bassenthwaite Lake Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The main source of metals is the Woodend Low Level but there is also diffuse pollution from waste spoil heaps. Until March 2011, the Woodend Low Level drainage tunnel was partially blocked and mine water had built-up behind the entrance. We have now cleared this blockage to prevent an uncontrolled breakout that might have caused a significant pollution incident.
In 2010, we investigated the impacts from the mine with funding from Defra. Our monitoring confirmed that the Woodend Low Level is one of the most polluting mine waters in the UK. In April 2012 we started more detailed monitoring of pollution from the mine using new funding from Defra. To help us, the Coal Authority installed a weir at the Woodend Low Level so we can measure the flow more accurately. We have also built three temporary weirs in Gategill Beck to work out how much pollution comes from the spoil heaps. We are collecting samples monthly for a year to confirm the pollution caused by the mine. We will then work with the Coal Authority to identify what can be done to clean up the pollution.
Key findings from the 2010 monitoring and the initial 2012 data are:
• Immediately downstream of the mine, metal concentrations in Gategill Beck are up to 1900 times the zinc environmental quality standard (EQS: 8 μg/l) and 375 times the cadmium EQS (0.08 μg/l). Even after dilution in the River Glenderamackin, two kilometres downstream, the zinc and cadmium concentrations are still up to 40 and 8 times the EQS respectively.
• Zinc and cadmium concentrations in the River Glenderamackin upstream of the confluence with Gategill Beck are almost always below the EQS. Copper is slightly above the EQS.
• At the Threlkeld flow gauging station on the River Glenderamackin, the average zinc loading from Gategill Beck is 8 tonnes per year, plus
24 kg/yr cadmium. At higher flows, this increases to 18 t/yr zinc and 69 kg/yr cadmium.
• Metal concentrations and flow from the Woodend Low Level do not significantly change, so the increased metal loading measured in the river at high flow is probably due to diffuse inputs from spoil heaps and re-suspension of contaminated sediments.
There is another problem in Gategill Beck. Two dams that were built in the stream to provide water for the mine are thought to be unstable. There is a high risk that culverts beneath them could collapse or be blocked up by trees or other debris during high flows. This could lead to the dams collapsing or flooding, which may affect properties and the A66 trunk road. In June 2012 a storm event caused a land slip at the top of Yellow Dam, and destabilised banks of the watercourse immediately downstream.
Impact of the mine
• Length of watercourse affected: 16 km
• Average metal concentration: Zinc = 39,820 μg/l, Cadmium = 79 μg/l, Lead = 441 μg/l, Nickel = 283 μg/l
• Load of zinc discharged per annum: up to 18 tonnes
• Load of cadmium discharged per annum: up to 69 kg
• Water body ecological status/potential: Moderate (River Glenderamackin, River Derwent)
Benefits of remediation
• Bassenthwaite Lake SSSI would be protected from a major pollution source
• The river corridor in a Special Area of Conservation would be improved
• Ecological improvements would be made to up to 16 km of river (Glenderamackin, Derwent)
• 18 tonnes of zinc and 69 kg of cadmium would be prevented from entering the river
• The estimated economic benefit of achieving Good Ecological Potential in the River Glenderamackin downstream of the mine is approximately £1.9 million over 25 years, with a further £1.6 million benefit from improving the River Derwent (upstream of Bassenthwaite Lake)
• Local properties and infrastructure could be protected from a significant flooding and pollution event
• Partnerships with the local community, Eden District Council, Natural England and the National Park could be developed. The Environment Agency is working with the Coal Authority to clean up pollution from abandoned metal mines to deliver a cleaner water environment with funding from Defra.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 07:19, 15 July 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Hugh
Main contact surname Potter
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations The Coal Authority (UK)
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Threlkeld mine was worked for lead and zinc between 1661 and 1928. The mine has a long history of causing pollution and fish kills, and the owners were first prosecuted in 1890. The mine is a significant source of heavy metal pollution, particularly cadmium and zinc, in Gategill Beck and the River Glenderamackin, which fails to achieve 'Good' status for the Water Framework Directive. The metal pollution also affects the River Derwent and Bassenthwaite Lake Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The main source of metals is the Woodend Low Level but there is also diffuse pollution from waste spoil heaps. Until March 2011, the Woodend Low Level drainage tunnel was partially blocked and mine water had built-up behind the entrance. We have now cleared this blockage to prevent an uncontrolled breakout that might have caused a significant pollution incident.

In 2010, we investigated the impacts from the mine with funding from Defra. Our monitoring confirmed that the Woodend Low Level is one of the most polluting mine waters in the UK. In April 2012 we started more detailed monitoring of pollution from the mine using new funding from Defra. To help us, the Coal Authority installed a weir at the Woodend Low Level so we can measure the flow more accurately. We have also built three temporary weirs in Gategill Beck to work out how much pollution comes from the spoil heaps. We are collecting samples monthly for a year to confirm the pollution caused by the mine. We will then work with the Coal Authority to identify what can be done to clean up the pollution.

Key findings from the 2010 monitoring and the initial 2012 data are: • Immediately downstream of the mine, metal concentrations in Gategill Beck are up to 1900 times the zinc environmental quality standard (EQS: 8 μg/l) and 375 times the cadmium EQS (0.08 μg/l). Even after dilution in the River Glenderamackin, two kilometres downstream, the zinc and cadmium concentrations are still up to 40 and 8 times the EQS respectively. • Zinc and cadmium concentrations in the River Glenderamackin upstream of the confluence with Gategill Beck are almost always below the EQS. Copper is slightly above the EQS. • At the Threlkeld flow gauging station on the River Glenderamackin, the average zinc loading from Gategill Beck is 8 tonnes per year, plus 24 kg/yr cadmium. At higher flows, this increases to 18 t/yr zinc and 69 kg/yr cadmium. • Metal concentrations and flow from the Woodend Low Level do not significantly change, so the increased metal loading measured in the river at high flow is probably due to diffuse inputs from spoil heaps and re-suspension of contaminated sediments.

There is another problem in Gategill Beck. Two dams that were built in the stream to provide water for the mine are thought to be unstable. There is a high risk that culverts beneath them could collapse or be blocked up by trees or other debris during high flows. This could lead to the dams collapsing or flooding, which may affect properties and the A66 trunk road. In June 2012 a storm event caused a land slip at the top of Yellow Dam, and destabilised banks of the watercourse immediately downstream.

Impact of the mine • Length of watercourse affected: 16 km • Average metal concentration: Zinc = 39,820 μg/l, Cadmium = 79 μg/l, Lead = 441 μg/l, Nickel = 283 μg/l • Load of zinc discharged per annum: up to 18 tonnes • Load of cadmium discharged per annum: up to 69 kg • Water body ecological status/potential: Moderate (River Glenderamackin, River Derwent)

Benefits of remediation • Bassenthwaite Lake SSSI would be protected from a major pollution source • The river corridor in a Special Area of Conservation would be improved • Ecological improvements would be made to up to 16 km of river (Glenderamackin, Derwent) • 18 tonnes of zinc and 69 kg of cadmium would be prevented from entering the river • The estimated economic benefit of achieving Good Ecological Potential in the River Glenderamackin downstream of the mine is approximately £1.9 million over 25 years, with a further £1.6 million benefit from improving the River Derwent (upstream of Bassenthwaite Lake) • Local properties and infrastructure could be protected from a significant flooding and pollution event • Partnerships with the local community, Eden District Council, Natural England and the National Park could be developed. The Environment Agency is working with the Coal Authority to clean up pollution from abandoned metal mines to deliver a cleaner water environment with funding from Defra.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information