Case study:Stony Stratford Sluice bank repairs: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Project overview |Status=Complete |Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |Country=England |Main contact forename=Rob |Main contact surname=Clapham |Main contact i...")
 
(XML import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Project overview
{{Case_study_status
|Status=Complete
|Approval status=Draft
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Rob
|Main contact surname=Clapham
|Main contact id=Robclapham
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
|Partner organisations=Milton Keynes Park's Trust
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Stony After.JPG
|Picture description=After Works
|Project summary=The Environment Agency's Fisheries & Biodiversity and Operations team along with Milton Keynes Park’s Trust repaired a section of eroded bank on the Great Ouse at Stony Stratford.
 
We used soft engineering in the form of willow bundle revetments to reinforce and protect a section of bank that had become eroded as a result of livestock poaching and flow pressures from Stony Sluice.
 
 
|Monitoring surveys and results=Fixed Photographs
}}
}}
{{Location
|Location=
   
   
     
}}
{{Project_overview
|Status=
   
   
      Complete
|Project web site url=
     
|Themes=
     
|Country=
      England
|Main contact forename=
      Rob
|Main contact surname=
      Clapham
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
{{Site
|Name=
   
   
     
|WFD water body code=
     
|WFD (national) typology=
     
|WFD water body name=
     
|Pre-project morphology=
     
|Reference morphology=
     
|Heavily modified water body=
     
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
     
|River corridor land use=
     
|Average bankfull channel width category=
     
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
{{Project_background
|Reach length directly affected=
   
   
     
|Project started=
     
|Works started=
     
|Works completed=
     
|Project completed=
     
|Total cost category=
     
|Total1 cost=
     
|Funding sources=
     
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
{{Motivations
|Hydromorphological quality elements=
   
   
     
|Biological quality elements=
     
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
     
|Specific mitigation=
     
|Other motivation=
     
}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
   
   
     
|Floodplain / River corridor=
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
     
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{End_table}}
{{Biological_quality_elements_header}}
{{End_table}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
{{End_table}}
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{End_table}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Supplementary_Information
|Information=
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
{{Toggle_content_end}}
{{Case_study_upload}}

Revision as of 08:57, 24 April 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

3.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Clapham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information