Case study:Brent Lodge Park Improvement: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Location=51.521686553955, -0.352481752634048 | |Location=51.521686553955, -0.352481752634048 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Complete | ||
|Country=England | |||
|Main contact forename=Neale | |||
|Main contact surname=Hider | |||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Multi-site=No | |||
|Project summary=Proposed works: | |||
- Re-meandering, close to historical water-course | |||
|Country= | - Removal of concrete / culverts | ||
- Creation of high flow channel | |||
|Main contact forename= | - Backwater creation | ||
- Improved amenity value | |||
|Main contact surname= | - Construction of bridge | ||
- Reedbeds | |||
- Outfall moved Channel has been straightened, culverted. | |||
Water quality is poor, and few species are supported. | |||
|Contact organisation= | |||
| | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} |
Revision as of 17:02, 8 April 2014
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 31' 18.07" N, 0° 21' 8.93" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Neale |
Main contact surname | Hider |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Proposed works:
- Re-meandering, close to historical water-course
- Removal of concrete / culverts
- Creation of high flow channel
- Backwater creation
- Improved amenity value
- Construction of bridge
- Reedbeds
- Outfall moved Channel has been straightened, culverted.
Water quality is poor, and few species are supported.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|