Case study:Meades water garden regeneration project

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 51° 42' 6.07" N, 0° 36' 41.97" W

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Meades water garden regeneration project\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=England\" title=\"England\"\u003EEngland\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Water quality\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Meades water garden regeneration project","link":"","lat":51.701686,"lon":-0.611659,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes	Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country	England
Main contact forename	Nick
Main contact surname	Elbourne
Main contact user ID	User:NickRRC
Contact organisation	River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site	http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations	Chiltern Chalk Streams Project
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

Looking upstream at the restored river

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

On the River Chess, The Meades Water Gardens are a public amenity area re-landscaped in the 1970s to create formal water gardens, through excavation of the beds and river. However, the ponds rapidly lost their wildlife and aesthetic value. The project planned to regenerate the Meade Water Gardens through the removal of weirs and the re-introduction of gravel beds.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment

Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district	Thames
River basin	Colne

Subcatchment

River name	Chess
Area category	10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category	200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m)	278278 m <br />0.278 km <br />27,800 cm <br />
Dominant geology	Calcareous
Ecoregion	Great Britain
Dominant land cover	Improved grassland
Waterbody ID	GB106039029870

Site

Edit site

Name	Meades Water Garden
WFD water body codes	GB106039029870
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name	Chess
Pre-project morphology	Single channel, Straight, High width:depth
Reference morphology	Single channel, Sinuous, Step-pool, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body	Yes
National/international site designation	UK - Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present	No
Invasive species present	No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology	Groundwater
Dominant substrate	Bedrock, Gravel
River corridor land use	Urban
Average bankfull channel width category	5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category	0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)

Project background

Edit project background

Reach length directly affected (m)	120 m0.12 km <br />12,000 cm <br />
Project started	2007/01/01
Works started
Works completed	2008/01/01
Project completed
Total cost category	50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€)	62 k€62,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase	cost category	cost exact (k€)	Lead organisation	Contact forename	Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration

Mitigation of a pressure	Reservoir impoundment
Hydromorphology	Quantity & dynamics of flow, Flow velocities
Biology	Macrophytes, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project	Habitat enhancement

Measures

Edit Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications	Planting, Introduction of gravel, Two weir removed
Floodplain / River corridor	Removal of diseased vegetation, Wetland created
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other	Public consultation, Information provision

Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Macrophytes	Yes	Yes	Yes			Improvement
Invertebrates	Yes	Yes				Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Downstream of the bridge during construction (top) and post-restoration (below)

Upstream of the bridge, during construction (top) and post-restoration (below)

Established wildlife upstream

Downstream of the bridge prior to project

Upstream of bridge prior to project

Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents

Additional links and references

Edit links and references

Link	Description
http://www.therrc.co.uk/case studies/meades%20water%20garden.pdf	River Restoration Centre Case Study

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information