Case study:Salmons Brook Urban Diffuse Pollution Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
}}
}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site}}
{{Site
|Name=Lower Lee
|Heavily modified water body=No
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}

Revision as of 06:10, 12 August 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Aimee
Main contact surname Felus
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Environment Agency, LB Enfield, University College London, Friends of groups, Thames Water
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Lower Lee Valley waterways are profoundly polluted. The problem of urban diffuse pollution is chronic and highly visible. It blights the potential of East London’s rivers, reducing them as an amenity for people, damaging them for wildlife and turning them into open sewers. These problems have existed for many years now, but increasing population density and climate change are seeing them intensify. What has been missing from efforts to tackle the problems is properly involving people. Awareness of the pollution is very low, evidenced by the proportionately small number of calls to the Environment Agency’s Pollution Hotline. East London’s communities are fundamental to any long lasting improvement in the Lower Lee Valley’s water quality. While strategic efforts will aim to address the problems truly sustainable solutions have to happen at the household and street level too. The issue of diffuse pollution must be addressed as a priority in improvement works to rivers, oth-erwise rivers in East London will still run with wastewater and road run-off.

Thames21 has secured funding from DEFRA for the Salmon’s Brook Healthy River Challenge – a project to reduce diffuse urban pollution in the Salmon’s Brook, a main tributary of the River Lea in Enfield. The project will see the creation of six community centred bio-retention and sustainable urban drainage systems (SuDS) along the Salmons Brook. These SuDS will intercept diffuse urban pollution, provide attenuation for flooding, and create new areas of biodiverse habitat and new amenities for local people.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Lower Lee
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information