Case study:River Calder improvement project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 173: Line 173:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation, Partial weir removal, Cobble placement
   
|Social measures='Trout in the Town' project raising the awareness of rivers value in schools
   
      Bank stabilisation,Partial weir removal,Cobble placement
|Floodplain / River corridor=
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
     
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

Revision as of 10:13, 9 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 48' 46.98" N, 2° 14' 58.60" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations Ribble Catchment Conservation Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Padiham weir deconstruction

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Calder Improvement Project, led by the Ribble Catchment Conservation Trust (RCCT), aim to ease the passage of fish species (specifically trout) and encourage upstream migration whilst improving the riverine habitat as a whole. This was achieved by the lowering of existing weirs, fish pass installation and more general habitat enhancement.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Subcatchment:Calder


Site

Edit site
Name Ribble Catchment
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Impounded, High width:depth
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Silt, Gravel
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 600 m0.6 km <br />60,000 cm <br />
Project started 2010/06/01
Works started
Works completed 2010/10/01
Project completed
Total cost category 500 - 1000 k€
Total cost (k€) 750 k€750,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Ribble Catchment Conservation Trust

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Reservoir impoundment
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Width & depth variation, Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Abundance
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Bank erosion, Enhance riverine habitat


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank stabilisation, Partial weir removal, Cobble placement
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) 'Trout in the Town' project raising the awareness of rivers value in schools
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information