Case study:Babingley River at Hillington: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
|River corridor land use=Agriculture (arable)/Woodland
|River corridor land use=Agriculture (arable)/Woodland
}}
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=420
|Project started=2006
|Project completed=2007/02/01
|Total cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Funding sources=Total cost: €695.00. Environment Agency and Hillington Fly Fishing Club
}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures}}

Revision as of 11:41, 8 July 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 48' 26.32" N, 0° 33' 42.62" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries
Country England
Main contact forename Andy
Main contact surname Sadler
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Babingley River at Hillington

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Babingley River rises from chalk springs above the villages of Flitcham and Hillington in North West Norfolk. The Hillington site is located close to the source and includes an impounded online lake known as the ‘Broadwater’. The aim of the project was to revert 420m of lake back to river in order to improve the water quality, remove barriers to fish and eel passage and provide additional spawning habitat for wild brown trout (Salmo trutta). At this site sluice boards were removed resulting in the lowering of the water level. This concentrated the flow and enabled the river to cut a new channel that would be more sustainable in the long term. Improvements in water quality as a result of the work created better habitat and spawning grounds and the removal of the sluice boards allowed free passage for fish to access these areas. However, lowering the water level created a barrier at the upstream weir, which had to be addressed using a pool and traverse fish easement created with rock rolls.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Babingley River at Hillington
WFD water body codes GB105033047620
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Impounded online lake
Reference morphology Narrower, shallower and sinuous channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Brown trout (Salmo trutta)
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Agriculture (arable)/Woodland
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 420420 m <br />0.42 km <br />42,000 cm <br />
Project started 2006
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2007/02/01
Total cost category Less than 1 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Total cost: €695.00. Environment Agency and Hillington Fly Fishing Club

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information