Case study:Cornmill Gardens (QUERCUS): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Social benefits | |Themes=Social benefits, Spatial planning | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Paul | |Main contact forename=Paul | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|Contact organisation=London Borough of Lewisham | |Contact organisation=London Borough of Lewisham | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.lewisham.gov.uk/Pages/default.aspx | |Contact organisation url=www.lewisham.gov.uk/Pages/default.aspx | ||
|Partner organisations=Environment Agency, | |Partner organisations=Environment Agency, Building Design Partnership, | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study: | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:QUERCUS Ravensbourne | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Cornmill gardens after.JPG | |Project picture=Cornmill gardens after.JPG | ||
|Project summary='''Site background''' | |||
Before the regeneration of this site, this section of the Ravensbourne flowed through an area known as the Sundermead Estate. The river had been constrained within a narrow concrete channel as part of an historic | |||
flood defence scheme. This, together with high steel railings and overgrown vegetation had resulted in a neglected river possessing little ecological or local community interest. The river restoration scheme | |||
formed part of the 'Urban Renaissance in Lewisham' programme which aimed to create a new public open space within the Town Centre. | |||
'''Objective''' | |||
To remove the river from it’s concrete banks and create an attractive public open space. | |||
'''Design''' | |||
Following the preparation of design proposals and a full public consultation, a masterplan was developed for the whole site. The concrete walls of the river were removed and replaced with more natural re-graded banks interspersed with steps and wooden platforms to improve river bank access. A puddle –clay | |||
liner was constructed to help restore flows. Gravels were introduced into the bed of the river. These were sized to ensure that they could move in the channel with respect to the flow conditions, thus creating natural habitat features for wildlife. Marginal areas were planted with native species such as Rush (Juncus effusus) and Yellow flag Iris (Iris pseudacorus) whilst a wildflower mix was sown along the banks. An overflow storage area which retains water during high flows was designed into the scheme by lowering an open space alongside the river. | |||
'''Subsequent Performance''' | |||
Flood management within the channel should have been improved through a combination of making space for water by reprofiling the bank and creating additional storage on the floodplain. The area demonstrates how river restoration can be an integral part of a regeneration programme the helps to create a more attractive, diverse and accessible public open space with a natural river able to support a range of wildlife; mallards and moorhens have already been cited. | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Cornmill Gardens before.JPG | |||
|Caption=prior to works | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Cornmill Gardens facing upstream.JPG | |||
|Caption=facing upstream | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Cornmill Gardens from downstream.JPG | |||
|Caption=downstream | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | |||
|Subcatchment=Ravensbourne (Catford to Deptford) | |||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Cornmill Gardens | |||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023270 | |||
|WFD water body name=Ravensbourne (Catford to Deptford) | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Artificial channel, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Species=Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica), Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera ), European eel (Anguilla anguilla), | |||
|River corridor land use=Urban, | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=100m | |||
|Project completed=2007/12/31 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=Flood and coastal erosion protection, | |||
|Biological quality elements= | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of concrete banks and bed, Bank reprofiling, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Buffer strips, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Improvement of channel morphology, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
Line 33: | Line 88: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.therrc.co.uk/case_studies/cornmill%20gardens.pdf | |||
|Description=RRC summary | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.therrc.co.uk/lrap/lplan.pdf | |||
|Description=London Rivers Action Plan | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=ww.ukcip.org.uk/.../wp.../EA-LA-case-studies-partnerships.pdf | |||
|Description=EA and LA case study | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 12:05, 1 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Social benefits, Spatial planning |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Paul |
Main contact surname | Chapman |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | London Borough of Lewisham |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/Pages/default.aspx |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, Building Design Partnership |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Site background
Before the regeneration of this site, this section of the Ravensbourne flowed through an area known as the Sundermead Estate. The river had been constrained within a narrow concrete channel as part of an historic flood defence scheme. This, together with high steel railings and overgrown vegetation had resulted in a neglected river possessing little ecological or local community interest. The river restoration scheme formed part of the 'Urban Renaissance in Lewisham' programme which aimed to create a new public open space within the Town Centre.
Objective
To remove the river from it’s concrete banks and create an attractive public open space.
Design
Following the preparation of design proposals and a full public consultation, a masterplan was developed for the whole site. The concrete walls of the river were removed and replaced with more natural re-graded banks interspersed with steps and wooden platforms to improve river bank access. A puddle –clay liner was constructed to help restore flows. Gravels were introduced into the bed of the river. These were sized to ensure that they could move in the channel with respect to the flow conditions, thus creating natural habitat features for wildlife. Marginal areas were planted with native species such as Rush (Juncus effusus) and Yellow flag Iris (Iris pseudacorus) whilst a wildflower mix was sown along the banks. An overflow storage area which retains water during high flows was designed into the scheme by lowering an open space alongside the river.
Subsequent Performance Flood management within the channel should have been improved through a combination of making space for water by reprofiling the bank and creating additional storage on the floodplain. The area demonstrates how river restoration can be an integral part of a regeneration programme the helps to create a more attractive, diverse and accessible public open space with a natural river able to support a range of wildlife; mallards and moorhens have already been cited.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Broadway Fields/ Seagers Distillary, Catford Greyhound Stadium, Ladywell Fields (QUERCUS), Ladywell Fields Phase 2, Ladywell Fields to Cornmill Gardens, Ladywell Fields toeboarding, Lewisham College weir, Linear Park, QUERCUS Ravensbourne, Ravensbourne Tescos... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|