Case study:River Wid restoration scheme: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology | |Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology | ||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk | |Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=The river restoration has introduced habitat features which will lead to the restoration of the hydromorphology of the WFD watercourse. Priority species this project may benefit include water voles and eels. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Wid | |Subcatchment=Wid (Ingatestone Hall - Margaretting Hall) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
Line 35: | Line 40: | ||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=1.5 | |Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=1.5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background | ||
{{Motivations}} | |Reach length directly affected=1400 | ||
{{Measures}} | |Project started=2012/09/01 | ||
|Works started=2012/10/01 | |||
|Works completed=2012/11/01 | |||
|Project completed=2013/12/01 | |||
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=Flood and Coastal Risk Management | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=Flood risk management, | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity of sediment transport, Channel pattern/planform, Width & depth variation, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish, Invertebrates, Macrophytes, | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Nutrient concentrations, dissolve oxygen, pH, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Adding sinuosity, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Floodplain reconnection, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel narrowing, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
Line 48: | Line 70: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 55: | Line 76: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 11:00, 31 May 2017
Location: 51° 39' 48.95" N, 0° 24' 3.76" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Tim |
Main contact surname | Gardiner |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
The river restoration has introduced habitat features which will lead to the restoration of the hydromorphology of the WFD watercourse. Priority species this project may benefit include water voles and eels.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|