Case study:River Monnow (Going Native): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.91139671753777, -2.9393577575683593 }} {{Project overview |Project title=River Monnow (Going Native) |Sta...") |
No edit summary |
||
(28 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=In progress | |Status=In progress | ||
|Project web site url=www.monnow.org/ | |||
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity | |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=Robert | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=Denny | ||
|Contact organisation= | |Contact organisation=Monnow Rivers Association | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.monnow.org/ | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Monnow HB after.png | |||
|Picture description=River Monnow after invasive non-native species removal | |||
|Project summary=The River catchment was dominated by invasive non-native species, specifically American mink and Himalayan Balsam, as well as Japanese Knotweed and Giant Hogweed. Their presence in the catchment was having a significant effect not only on ecology, but also access for recreational activities such as walking and fishing. | |||
Project objectives included: | |||
• The identification of bankside areas affected by invasive non-native species | |||
• Achieve catchment wide eradication of Himalayan Balsam (HB), Japanese Knotweed (JK) and Giant Hogweed (GHW) | |||
• Maintain mink free status of the catchment (developed by the game and wildlife conservation trust) to monitor and control mink and reintroduce water voles to the River Dore | |||
• Educate children, local community and other catchments about invasive non-native species and the River Monnow project | |||
All sites with GHW and JK were mapped in 2007, as well as an estimation of the upper extent of HB sites on tributaries. Volunteers were used to spray and hand pulled large areas of HB which was repeated 3 or 4 times before the first frost. All HB sites were revisited several times to ensure no plants went to seed, and the control area was extended, again with the use of volunteers. After year 3 of treatments HB had been eradicated. | |||
This process of HB eradication was rolled out catchment wide using paid contractors, with follow up by volunteers. By Autumn 2012 70km of previously effected area will have had the initial treatment phase, with 25km of the catchment now HB free. | |||
GNW and JK was sprayed in the spring and treated in the autumn annually, however these were not widespread in the catchment. | |||
Costs for the last three years of work amount to £60,000 with 4,600 paid-for man hours and 1,200 voluntary hours. This equates to a figure so far of £822 per kilometre with an effort of 87 man hours per kilometre. Two more years of work are estimated (mainly hand-pulling and largely by volunteers), which would add a further 20% to those figures. | |||
The project has been funded by Environment Agency, Natural England and Tidy Towns Wales. Generous private donations from fishery owners and fund-raising by the association has added to the project budget. | |||
Mink have been monitored by volunteers, with captured numbers reducing to just 5 in 2007. Volunteers also annually monitor areas where water voles have been reintroduced, numbers and range are increasing. | |||
Two schools have been introduced to “the joys of Mayfly in the classroom”, to introduce children to the importance of healthy rivers and the connection between fishing and conservation. | |||
Produced and erected 100 signs on footpaths identifying the problem of Himalayan Balsam. | |||
By 2014 the project aims to have eradicated Himalayan Balsam from the catchment. Natural bankside vegetation is already re-established in many areas, significantly reducing erosion and sediment release. | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Monnow HB before.png | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Monnow HB after.png | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | |||
|Subcatchment=R Monnow - conf Afon Honddu to conf R Wye | |||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=River Monnow, Herefordshire and Monmouthshire | |||
|WFD water body code=GB109055029720 | |||
|WFD water body name=R Monnow - conf Afon Honddu to conf R Wye | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Local site designation=water vole (habitat for protectes species) | |||
|Protected species present=Yes | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Species=invasive non-native species: American mink, Himalayan Balsam, Japanese Knotweed, Giant Hogweed | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=25,000 | |||
|Project started=2007 | |||
|Project completed=2014/01/01 | |||
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=Environment Agency, Natural England, Tidy Towns Wales, Monnow Rivers Association fundraising, private donations | |||
|Supplementary funding information=Costs for the last three years of work (2010 to 2013) amount to £60,000 with 4,600 paid-for man hours and 1,200 voluntary hours. This equates to a figure so far of £822 per kilometre with an effort of 87 man hours per kilometre. Two more years of work are estimated (mainly hand-pulling and largely by volunteers), which would add a further 20% to those figures. | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=invasive non-native species | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of invasive species, | |||
|Social measures=Engagement with schools, | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Information board erected, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
Line 29: | Line 87: | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Case study monitoring documents | |||
|Monitoring document=Water vole surveys.png | |||
|Description=Water vole surveys undertaken annually by volunteers | |||
}} | |||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 37: | Line 98: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 09:37, 21 June 2017
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.monnow.org/ |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Robert |
Main contact surname | Denny |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Monnow Rivers Association |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.monnow.org/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The River catchment was dominated by invasive non-native species, specifically American mink and Himalayan Balsam, as well as Japanese Knotweed and Giant Hogweed. Their presence in the catchment was having a significant effect not only on ecology, but also access for recreational activities such as walking and fishing.
Project objectives included:
• The identification of bankside areas affected by invasive non-native species
• Achieve catchment wide eradication of Himalayan Balsam (HB), Japanese Knotweed (JK) and Giant Hogweed (GHW)
• Maintain mink free status of the catchment (developed by the game and wildlife conservation trust) to monitor and control mink and reintroduce water voles to the River Dore
• Educate children, local community and other catchments about invasive non-native species and the River Monnow project
All sites with GHW and JK were mapped in 2007, as well as an estimation of the upper extent of HB sites on tributaries. Volunteers were used to spray and hand pulled large areas of HB which was repeated 3 or 4 times before the first frost. All HB sites were revisited several times to ensure no plants went to seed, and the control area was extended, again with the use of volunteers. After year 3 of treatments HB had been eradicated. This process of HB eradication was rolled out catchment wide using paid contractors, with follow up by volunteers. By Autumn 2012 70km of previously effected area will have had the initial treatment phase, with 25km of the catchment now HB free. GNW and JK was sprayed in the spring and treated in the autumn annually, however these were not widespread in the catchment. Costs for the last three years of work amount to £60,000 with 4,600 paid-for man hours and 1,200 voluntary hours. This equates to a figure so far of £822 per kilometre with an effort of 87 man hours per kilometre. Two more years of work are estimated (mainly hand-pulling and largely by volunteers), which would add a further 20% to those figures. The project has been funded by Environment Agency, Natural England and Tidy Towns Wales. Generous private donations from fishery owners and fund-raising by the association has added to the project budget. Mink have been monitored by volunteers, with captured numbers reducing to just 5 in 2007. Volunteers also annually monitor areas where water voles have been reintroduced, numbers and range are increasing. Two schools have been introduced to “the joys of Mayfly in the classroom”, to introduce children to the importance of healthy rivers and the connection between fishing and conservation. Produced and erected 100 signs on footpaths identifying the problem of Himalayan Balsam. By 2014 the project aims to have eradicated Himalayan Balsam from the catchment. Natural bankside vegetation is already re-established in many areas, significantly reducing erosion and sediment release.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Kentchurch Weir Removal
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationCosts for the last three years of work (2010 to 2013) amount to £60,000 with 4,600 paid-for man hours and 1,200 voluntary hours. This equates to a figure so far of £822 per kilometre with an effort of 87 man hours per kilometre. Two more years of work are estimated (mainly hand-pulling and largely by volunteers), which would add a further 20% to those figures.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|