Case study:River Eye: Difference between revisions
Alan Graham (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=52.756881729405926, -0.8193740839487873 }} {{Project overview |Project title=River Eye |Status=Complete |The...") |
m (Alexrrc moved page Case study:River Eye 3 to Case study:River Eye) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity | |Themes=Habitat and biodiversity | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
|Contact organisation=Trent Rivers Trust | |Contact organisation=Trent Rivers Trust | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.trentriverstrust.org | |Contact organisation url=www.trentriverstrust.org | ||
|Partner organisations=Natural England | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Brushwood mattresse.JPG | |||
|Project summary=The aim of the project was to restore reaches of river within the SSSI. In particular to increase channel sinuosity, retain large woody material, carry out bank enhancement and raise bed levels. Carry out tree management where agreed in the Strategic Restoration Plan (Royal Hakoning, 2014). | |||
The works consisted of constructing in channel and bank features to conserve, enhance, restore, and rehabilitate features along the river. A total of 30 features were installed to stimulate the level of natural processes to return the SSSI back to favourable condition in the medium to longer term. | |||
• Bank re-profiling – 10 stretches of bank mainly the inside of meanders were re-profiled to vary the gradients, creating shallows and increase habitats. | |||
• Channel narrowing – In 4 suitable location banks were pushed into the channel to create backwaters | |||
• Brushwood mattresses – 9 BWM were installed to narrow over wide and straight sections of channel. | |||
• Large Wood Material – Locally sourced timber was installed in 7 location to add flow variation to the channel. | |||
• Gravel – Gravel was added to 3 locations to raise the bed level. It was introduced at 4 m intervals. | |||
• Tree planting – The river has little riparian tree cover so 475 trees were planted in 6 blocks. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=As part of the restoration project TRT is undertaking a fixed point monitoring programme of the measures delivered. It includes photographs of each site before, during and post construction. | |||
The site was visited in December 2016 and all features were in situ and performing as planned. | |||
|Lessons learn=The long term overall benefits in terms of biodiversity of the restoration will been significant. However during the planning and the delivery stages several issues came to light that made the work more complicated and increased costs. | |||
|Project title=River Eye | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Re profiled bank.JPG | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Re profiled bank 2.JPG | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=BWM.JPG | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
{{Project background}} | |Name=River Eye | ||
{{Motivations}} | |WFD water body code=GB104028047550 | ||
{{Measures}} | |WFD water body name=River Eye | ||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Site designation=UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Species=white clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes), water boatman (Corixa panzeri) and white-legged damselfly (Platycnemis pennipes) | |||
|Dominant substrate=Clay | |||
|River corridor land use=Arable/pasture | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=808 | |||
|Project started=2013 | |||
|Works started=2016/10/04 | |||
|Works completed=2017/03/20 | |||
|Project completed=2017/03/20 | |||
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=Natural England, | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Channel pattern/planform, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Introducing large woody debris, Bed raising, Bank reprofiling, Introduction of gravel, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Tree management, Tree planting, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel narrowing, Creation of backwater, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Latest revision as of 11:46, 3 January 2019
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Ruth |
Main contact surname | Needham |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Trent Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.trentriverstrust.org |
Partner organisations | Natural England |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The aim of the project was to restore reaches of river within the SSSI. In particular to increase channel sinuosity, retain large woody material, carry out bank enhancement and raise bed levels. Carry out tree management where agreed in the Strategic Restoration Plan (Royal Hakoning, 2014).
The works consisted of constructing in channel and bank features to conserve, enhance, restore, and rehabilitate features along the river. A total of 30 features were installed to stimulate the level of natural processes to return the SSSI back to favourable condition in the medium to longer term.
• Bank re-profiling – 10 stretches of bank mainly the inside of meanders were re-profiled to vary the gradients, creating shallows and increase habitats. • Channel narrowing – In 4 suitable location banks were pushed into the channel to create backwaters • Brushwood mattresses – 9 BWM were installed to narrow over wide and straight sections of channel. • Large Wood Material – Locally sourced timber was installed in 7 location to add flow variation to the channel. • Gravel – Gravel was added to 3 locations to raise the bed level. It was introduced at 4 m intervals. • Tree planting – The river has little riparian tree cover so 475 trees were planted in 6 blocks.
Monitoring surveys and results
As part of the restoration project TRT is undertaking a fixed point monitoring programme of the measures delivered. It includes photographs of each site before, during and post construction.
The site was visited in December 2016 and all features were in situ and performing as planned.
Lessons learnt
The long term overall benefits in terms of biodiversity of the restoration will been significant. However during the planning and the delivery stages several issues came to light that made the work more complicated and increased costs.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|