Case study:SHerston River IMProvement (SHRIMP) Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 18: Line 18:
|Project picture=Shrimp.jpg
|Project picture=Shrimp.jpg
|Picture description=Sherston River Project
|Picture description=Sherston River Project
|Project summary=The project worked on a site containing a public footpath popular with local residents and school children, to restore a section of river suffering from various anthropogenic impacts. The river supports small populations of brown trout and bullhead, amongst other species, and has suitable substrate capable of supporting greater fish numbers. However, summer low flow conditions throughout much of the site were often unfavourable for this prior to these works.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
Line 30: Line 31:
|Invasive species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
}}
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background
{{Motivations}}
|Project started=2015/09/01
{{Measures}}
}}
{{Motivations
|Specific mitigation=Historic over-widening and straightening led to lower summer flows unfavourable for trout and bullhead survival
|Biological quality elements=Fish
}}
{{Measures
|Planform / Channel pattern=Introducing large woody debris, brushwood berms to increase scour on the gravels, Habitat creation, Creation of fish refuge areas, Cut back of trees,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Latest revision as of 09:41, 2 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 34' 8.45" N, 2° 12' 58.61" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Harriet
Main contact surname Alvis
Main contact user ID User:H.alv
Contact organisation Bristol Avon Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.bristolavonriverstrust.org
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Sherston River Project

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The project worked on a site containing a public footpath popular with local residents and school children, to restore a section of river suffering from various anthropogenic impacts. The river supports small populations of brown trout and bullhead, amongst other species, and has suitable substrate capable of supporting greater fish numbers. However, summer low flow conditions throughout much of the site were often unfavourable for this prior to these works.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name River Avon
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2015/09/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Historic over-widening and straightening led to lower summer flows unfavourable for trout and bullhead survival
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Introducing large woody debris, brushwood berms to increase scour on the gravels, Habitat creation, Creation of fish refuge areas, Cut back of trees
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information