Case study:Stanmore Marsh: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
{{Project background}} | |Name=Stanmore Marsh | ||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=0.8km | |||
|Funding sources=Funded from GLA Big Green Fund II, Harrow Drainage Capital £100,000 and Section 106 funding from housing development and Local Area Agreement | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Specific mitigation=Physical, point source and diffuse pollution | |Specific mitigation=Physical, point source and diffuse pollution |
Latest revision as of 12:56, 19 December 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Michael |
Main contact surname | Bradshaw |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | London Borough of Harrow |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project is one of a number of flood storage/river & marsh restoration projects that have been in development dating back pre Flood & Water Management Act. The main objectives for this project are to make space for water through 3000m3 of flood storage, improve the river corridor hydrology, biodiversity, public space amenity including access for all and opportunity for encouraging water environmental education and more healthy lifestyles through wetland and woodland walks and nature trails. This will provide a basis to achieve the wider and longer term aims to improving water quality, more diverse flora, fauna, ecology, wildlife and habitat.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|