Case study:Stanmore Marsh: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site}}
{{Site
{{Project background}}
|Name=Stanmore Marsh
|Heavily modified water body=No
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
}}
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=0.8km
|Funding sources=Funded from GLA Big Green Fund II, Harrow Drainage Capital £100,000 and Section 106 funding from housing development and Local Area Agreement
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Specific mitigation=Physical, point source and diffuse pollution
|Specific mitigation=Physical, point source and diffuse pollution

Latest revision as of 12:56, 19 December 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 36' 27.58" N, 0° 18' 2.44" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management
Country England
Main contact forename Michael
Main contact surname Bradshaw
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation London Borough of Harrow
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project is one of a number of flood storage/river & marsh restoration projects that have been in development dating back pre Flood & Water Management Act. The main objectives for this project are to make space for water through 3000m3 of flood storage, improve the river corridor hydrology, biodiversity, public space amenity including access for all and opportunity for encouraging water environmental education and more healthy lifestyles through wetland and woodland walks and nature trails. This will provide a basis to achieve the wider and longer term aims to improving water quality, more diverse flora, fauna, ecology, wildlife and habitat.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Stanmore Marsh
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 0.8km800 m <br />80,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Funded from GLA Big Green Fund II, Harrow Drainage Capital £100, 000 and Section 106 funding from housing development and Local Area Agreement

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Physical, point source and diffuse pollution
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information