Case study:Ravensbury Park back channel: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
   
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 19: Line 12:
|Main contact surname=Davies
|Main contact surname=Davies
|Contact organisation=Wandle Trust
|Contact organisation=Wandle Trust
|Contact organisation url=www.wandletrust.org
|Partner organisations=Defra, London Borough of Merton, Living Wandle Landscape Partnership,
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=Improve instream habitat through weed planting, coir rolls, flow deflector and tree thinning Small back channel around sluice gate and weir on the Wandle.
|Project picture=Graphic.png
|Lessons learn=Some ranunculus took but most did not. This may well be because we were only permitted to undertake a small amount of tree thinning (the area is important for bats) and it was insufficient to get much light to the river.
|Picture description=Ravensbury Park Back Channel © Wandle Trust
|Project summary=This project is one of four sites delivered through the Defra Catchment Restoration Fund.
 
A total of 100 m of river corridor was improved.
 
Throughout the site toe boarding was removed and the bank renaturalised to create marginal habitat. A low flow channel was created using faggot bundles and coir rolls with the new banks planted up by local volunteers.  
 
Large Woody Material (LWM) was installed to further increase flow diversity.
 
A number of bat hotels and bird boxes were installed in the surrounding green space with volunteers.  
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery}}

Latest revision as of 09:45, 18 February 2016

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 23' 54.50" N, 0° 11' 0.29" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Bella
Main contact surname Davies
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wandle Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.wandletrust.org
Partner organisations Defra, London Borough of Merton, Living Wandle Landscape Partnership
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Ravensbury Park Back Channel © Wandle Trust

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project is one of four sites delivered through the Defra Catchment Restoration Fund.

A total of 100 m of river corridor was improved.

Throughout the site toe boarding was removed and the bank renaturalised to create marginal habitat. A low flow channel was created using faggot bundles and coir rolls with the new banks planted up by local volunteers.

Large Woody Material (LWM) was installed to further increase flow diversity.

A number of bat hotels and bird boxes were installed in the surrounding green space with volunteers.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 282282 m <br />0.282 km <br />28,200 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039023460



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beddington Park, Beddington Park Enhancements, Boulder Pool and Plough Lane, Durand Close, EDF Weir removal, Eel Pass over tilting weir at Ravensbury Park, Garratt Park, Hackbridge Restoration, Hackbridge weir notch, King Georges Park... further results


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106039023460
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 50 m0.05 km <br />5,000 cm <br />
Project started 2010/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2011/01/01
Project completed
Total cost category 1 - 10 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Wandle Piscators, Wandle Trust

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Riparian development
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank reprofiling, Installation of coir rolls, Deflectors
Floodplain / River corridor Tree management
Planform / Channel pattern Creation of backwater
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information