Case study:Hale Wharf: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106038027950 | |WFD water body code=GB106038027950 | ||
|WFD water body name=Lee Navigation Subsiduary A | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |Heavily modified water body=No | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No |
Latest revision as of 09:52, 27 October 2015
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 35' 24.45" N, 0° 3' 15.14" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | John |
Main contact surname | Bryden |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | Developers, Environment Agency, BW, Haringey London Borough |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Potential restoration of the Navigation (yet to be agreed with BW) and potential restoration (full or partial) of the Lee New Cut. Development of the land in-between these water bodies, mitigation/enhancement for ecological reasons associated with the development, resulting in improved amenity and aesthetics.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Columbia Wharf
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|