Case study:Wandle River Restoration Project: Hackbridge: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.377131, -0.160390 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Wandle River Restoration Project: Hackbridge |Stat...") |
No edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |||
|Status= | |||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits | |Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Tim | |Main contact forename=Tim | ||
|Main contact surname=Longstaff | |Main contact surname=Longstaff | ||
|Main contact id= | |Main contact id=Pollygwenbryant | ||
|Contact organisation=Wandle Trust | |Contact organisation=Wandle Trust | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.wandletrust.org | |||
|Partner organisations=London Borough of Sutton, | |||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:River Wandle Restoration Project | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Hackbridge Before, During and After.png | |||
|Picture description=Hackbridge Restoration © Wandle Trust | |||
|Project summary=This project is one of four sites delivered through the Defra Catchment Restoration Fund. | |||
Designs were developed based on detailed 2D flood modelling undertaken in conjunction with cbec eco-engineering. Practical works were delivered during Summer 2014 with appointed contractors, Cain Bioengineering. | |||
The work started with the removal of old toe-boarding from around the edge of Culvers Island. The island was re-profiled with a new bank line created using hazel faggot bundles secured with chestnut stakes and backed with coir netting. Sediment from the channel was then placed behind the new bank line. | |||
The weir structures either side of the island were removed and the river channel narrowed using a combination of chestnut posts and hazel faggot bundles or gabion stone. | |||
A causeway was built to create a backwater pond area using coir geotextile layered over a bed of stone and weighed down with gravel and sediment and planted with aquatic plants. The new island banks were re-graded to create a gradually sloped bank to which a variety of aquatic vegetation was planted with a team of 60 volunteers over three days. | |||
Variations in depth, width and the introduction of gravel, small boulders and Large Woody Debris have all provided a diversity of habitats and increased the flow diversity of the channel throughout the site. | |||
|Lessons learn=Challenges: | |||
- Very urban nature of the site. Complex flood modelling and design was required. | |||
- Multiple underground utilities which had to be identified and avoided during the works. | |||
- Many and varied stakeholder needs and opinions. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Line 20: | Line 46: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Wandle (Carshalton Branch at Carshalton) | ||
{{Project background}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Site | ||
{{Measures}} | |WFD water body code=GB106039017640 | ||
|WFD water body name=Wandle (Carshalton Branch at Carshalton) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Project started=2012/09/01 | |||
|Works started=2015/03/01 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Quantity & dynamics of flow, Width & depth variation, | |||
|Biological quality elements=fish passage, fish habitat, invertebrates, plants | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=improved oxygenation | |||
|Other motivation=enhanced aesthetics | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Weir removal, Habitat diversification, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Marginal wetland berms created | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Increase in-channel hydromorphological diversity, | |||
|Social measures=Community involvement, Aesthetics, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Latest revision as of 15:30, 6 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Tim |
Main contact surname | Longstaff |
Main contact user ID | User:Pollygwenbryant |
Contact organisation | Wandle Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wandletrust.org |
Partner organisations | London Borough of Sutton |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project is one of four sites delivered through the Defra Catchment Restoration Fund.
Designs were developed based on detailed 2D flood modelling undertaken in conjunction with cbec eco-engineering. Practical works were delivered during Summer 2014 with appointed contractors, Cain Bioengineering.
The work started with the removal of old toe-boarding from around the edge of Culvers Island. The island was re-profiled with a new bank line created using hazel faggot bundles secured with chestnut stakes and backed with coir netting. Sediment from the channel was then placed behind the new bank line.
The weir structures either side of the island were removed and the river channel narrowed using a combination of chestnut posts and hazel faggot bundles or gabion stone.
A causeway was built to create a backwater pond area using coir geotextile layered over a bed of stone and weighed down with gravel and sediment and planted with aquatic plants. The new island banks were re-graded to create a gradually sloped bank to which a variety of aquatic vegetation was planted with a team of 60 volunteers over three days.
Variations in depth, width and the introduction of gravel, small boulders and Large Woody Debris have all provided a diversity of habitats and increased the flow diversity of the channel throughout the site.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Challenges:
- Very urban nature of the site. Complex flood modelling and design was required.
- Multiple underground utilities which had to be identified and avoided during the works.
- Many and varied stakeholder needs and opinions.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Butter Hill Phase 2, River Wandle Restoration Project, River Wandle: Butter Hill Phase 1, River Wandle: Silt & SuDs
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|