Case study:Woughton on the Green bank stabilization: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 14: Line 14:
|Partner organisations=Milton Keynes Park's Trust
|Partner organisations=Milton Keynes Park's Trust
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=IMG 4832.JPG
|Project summary=Dog bathing and signal crayfish activity had significantly weakened a 30-metre section of bank on the Ouzel in Milton Keynes.  Significant amounts of bank material were collapsing in to the river, contributing to deterioration of river habitats.  Furthermore, there was concern that a well used footpath, adjacent to this section, was at risk of failure in the future if nothing were done to stabilize the bank.
Works were jointly undertaken by the Environment Agency, Park's Trust and Volunteers to improve public safety and to prevent further deterioration of habitats.
Willow logs and brash, were collected by the Park's Trust who were undertaking scheduled tree works in the area.  These were secured in the channel using fence posts and steel fencing wire (see photos).
|Lessons learn=While the project was successful at stabilizing the bank where it was most at risk (i.e. steep and close to public footpath), the bank poaching caused by dogs has just moved to another location.  This should be considered in any similar project that seeks to restore bank that is deteriorating as a result of livestock or recreational activity.  Consider where dogs or livestock will next enter the river, and consider whether the river at that point will be sensitive to the pressure.  Are there any other unstable banks or important habitats such as spawning gravels that may be impacted?  Consider whether fencing or formal drinking bathing points may be required.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=IMG 4816.JPG
|Caption=Large log bundles at base
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=IMG 4821.JPG
|Caption=First row of willow bundles in place
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=IMG 4837.JPG
|Caption=Bundles and wiring
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Ouzel US Caldecote Mill
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=Woughton on the Green
|Name=Woughton on the Green
Line 58: Line 79:
|Other motivation=Prevent loss of adjacent footpath due to bank collapse
|Other motivation=Prevent loss of adjacent footpath due to bank collapse
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Latest revision as of 10:29, 6 January 2015

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 2' 8.88" N, 0° 43' 8.22" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Clapham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Milton Keynes Park's Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Dog bathing and signal crayfish activity had significantly weakened a 30-metre section of bank on the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. Significant amounts of bank material were collapsing in to the river, contributing to deterioration of river habitats. Furthermore, there was concern that a well used footpath, adjacent to this section, was at risk of failure in the future if nothing were done to stabilize the bank.

Works were jointly undertaken by the Environment Agency, Park's Trust and Volunteers to improve public safety and to prevent further deterioration of habitats.

Willow logs and brash, were collected by the Park's Trust who were undertaking scheduled tree works in the area. These were secured in the channel using fence posts and steel fencing wire (see photos).

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


While the project was successful at stabilizing the bank where it was most at risk (i.e. steep and close to public footpath), the bank poaching caused by dogs has just moved to another location. This should be considered in any similar project that seeks to restore bank that is deteriorating as a result of livestock or recreational activity. Consider where dogs or livestock will next enter the river, and consider whether the river at that point will be sensitive to the pressure. Are there any other unstable banks or important habitats such as spawning gravels that may be impacted? Consider whether fencing or formal drinking bathing points may be required.


Image gallery


Large log bundles at base
First row of willow bundles in place
Bundles and wiring
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Upper and Bedford Ouse

Subcatchment

River name Ouzel US Caldecote Mill
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 183183 m <br />0.183 km <br />18,300 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105033037971



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ouzel habitat improvement


Site

Name Woughton on the Green
WFD water body codes GB105033037971
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name Ouzel US Caldecote Mill
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 3030 m <br />0.03 km <br />3,000 cm <br />
Project started 2014/09/09
Works started 2014/10/09
Works completed 2014/10/10
Project completed
Total cost category Less than 1 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Stakeholder engagement and communication Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Works and works supervision Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Post-project management and maintenance Less than 1 k€ Milton Keynes Park's Trust Rob Rieke
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Substrate conditions
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Prevent loss of adjacent footpath due to bank collapse


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank stabilisation
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information