Case study:Woughton on the Green bank stabilization: Difference between revisions
Robclapham (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=52.035799, -0.71895003 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Woughton on the Green bank stabilization |Status...") |
No edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity | |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
|Main contact surname=Clapham | |Main contact surname=Clapham | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |Contact organisation=Environment Agency | ||
|Partner organisations=Milton Keynes Park's Trust | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=IMG 4832.JPG | |||
|Project summary=Dog bathing and signal crayfish activity had significantly weakened a 30-metre section of bank on the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. Significant amounts of bank material were collapsing in to the river, contributing to deterioration of river habitats. Furthermore, there was concern that a well used footpath, adjacent to this section, was at risk of failure in the future if nothing were done to stabilize the bank. | |||
Works were jointly undertaken by the Environment Agency, Park's Trust and Volunteers to improve public safety and to prevent further deterioration of habitats. | |||
Willow logs and brash, were collected by the Park's Trust who were undertaking scheduled tree works in the area. These were secured in the channel using fence posts and steel fencing wire (see photos). | |||
|Lessons learn=While the project was successful at stabilizing the bank where it was most at risk (i.e. steep and close to public footpath), the bank poaching caused by dogs has just moved to another location. This should be considered in any similar project that seeks to restore bank that is deteriorating as a result of livestock or recreational activity. Consider where dogs or livestock will next enter the river, and consider whether the river at that point will be sensitive to the pressure. Are there any other unstable banks or important habitats such as spawning gravels that may be impacted? Consider whether fencing or formal drinking bathing points may be required. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=IMG 4816.JPG | |||
|Caption=Large log bundles at base | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=IMG 4821.JPG | |||
|Caption=First row of willow bundles in place | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=IMG 4837.JPG | |||
|Caption=Bundles and wiring | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Ouzel US Caldecote Mill | ||
{{Project background}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Site | ||
{{Measures}} | |Name=Woughton on the Green | ||
|WFD water body code=GB105033037971, | |||
|WFD (national) typology=Low, Medium, Calcareous | |||
|WFD water body name=Ouzel US Caldecote Mill | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=30 | |||
|Project started=2014/09/09 | |||
|Works started=2014/10/09 | |||
|Works completed=2014/10/10 | |||
|Total cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Investigation and design cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Clapham | |||
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Clapham | |||
|Works1 and supervision cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Clapham | |||
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Milton Keynes Park's Trust | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Rieke | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Substrate conditions, | |||
|Other motivation=Prevent loss of adjacent footpath due to bank collapse | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Latest revision as of 10:29, 6 January 2015
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rob |
Main contact surname | Clapham |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Milton Keynes Park's Trust |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Dog bathing and signal crayfish activity had significantly weakened a 30-metre section of bank on the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. Significant amounts of bank material were collapsing in to the river, contributing to deterioration of river habitats. Furthermore, there was concern that a well used footpath, adjacent to this section, was at risk of failure in the future if nothing were done to stabilize the bank.
Works were jointly undertaken by the Environment Agency, Park's Trust and Volunteers to improve public safety and to prevent further deterioration of habitats.
Willow logs and brash, were collected by the Park's Trust who were undertaking scheduled tree works in the area. These were secured in the channel using fence posts and steel fencing wire (see photos).
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
While the project was successful at stabilizing the bank where it was most at risk (i.e. steep and close to public footpath), the bank poaching caused by dogs has just moved to another location. This should be considered in any similar project that seeks to restore bank that is deteriorating as a result of livestock or recreational activity. Consider where dogs or livestock will next enter the river, and consider whether the river at that point will be sensitive to the pressure. Are there any other unstable banks or important habitats such as spawning gravels that may be impacted? Consider whether fencing or formal drinking bathing points may be required.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ouzel habitat improvement
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|