Case study:Adams Mill enhancements: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 12: Line 12:
|Main contact surname=Clapham
|Main contact surname=Clapham
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Partner organisations=Milton Keynes Angling Association, Woodland Trust,
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Installing bundles.JPG
|Picture description=Stabilization work commences
|Picture description=Stabilization work commences
|Project summary=Site is location of a historically successful Barbel fishery.  Recent deterioration has been noted by EA and Anglers at this location.  Surveys have shown that the decline is likely to be a result of increased sediment load from collapse banks undermined by signal crayfish activity, along with historic modification that have reduced the natural resilience of the river.
|Project summary=Site is location of a historically successful Barbel fishery.  Recent deterioration has been noted by EA and Anglers at this location.  Surveys have shown that the decline is likely to be a result of increased sediment load from collapsed banks undermined by signal crayfish activity, along with historic modifications that have reduced the natural resilience of the river.


Measures undertaken and planned at this site include:
Measures undertaken and planned at this site include:


- Tree planting (started April 2014)
- Tree planting (started April 2014)
- Bank stabilization(started October 2014)
50 Willow whips planted in margins of river.
 
- Further tree planting (Completed in Feb 2015)
100 Alder, 50 Hawthorn, 25 Oak, 25 Maple and other species, to be planted along this section of river with support from Woodlands Trust.
 
- Bank stabilization( October 2014)
2 sections of bank stabilazation completed using brushwood bundles, staked into bank. 
 
- Riffle enhancement(started October 2014)
- Riffle enhancement(started October 2014)
1 riffle enhancement installed in October 2014.  (2 Poplar logs staked and tied with fencing wire).
1 riffle ehancement installed in additional location in Feb 2015 (5 Poplar logs 2-4 m in length  secured with 20mm re-bar.  Logs to be in alternating orientations to maximise variation in scour patterns).
- Channel narrowing (expected 2015)
- Channel narrowing (expected 2015)


 
All work undertaken by Environment Agency with assistance from local volunteers.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Location of riffle enhancement is at location of existing WFD monitoring site for fish.  Pre- and post-enhancement survey data will be available.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Location of riffle enhancement 1 is existing WFD monitoring site for fish.  Pre- and post-enhancement survey data will be available.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
Line 38: Line 50:
{{Case study image
{{Case study image
|File name=Wood pile.JPG
|File name=Wood pile.JPG
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=IMG 5019.JPG
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=PA030216.JPG
}}
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Ouse (Cosgrove to Newport Pagnell)
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=Adams Mill
|Name=Adams Mill
Line 60: Line 80:
|Works started=2014/10/03
|Works started=2014/10/03
|Total cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Total cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Funding sources=WFD GiA
|Funding sources=Environment Agency Grant in Aid,
|Investigation and design cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Investigation and design cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Environment Agency
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Environment Agency
Line 78: Line 98:
|Specific mitigation=Invasive species, sediment, Flood protection maintenance works,  
|Specific mitigation=Invasive species, sediment, Flood protection maintenance works,  
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation,
|Planform / Channel pattern=Increase in-channel hydromorphological diversity,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=Substrate conditions
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=Quantity & dynamics of flow
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=Fish
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
}}
{{Biological quality element table row
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other response table row
|Element=Habitat mapping
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}

Latest revision as of 13:45, 1 November 2018

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 5' 51.58" N, 0° 45' 14.71" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Clapham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Milton Keynes Angling Association, Woodland Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Stabilization work commences

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Site is location of a historically successful Barbel fishery. Recent deterioration has been noted by EA and Anglers at this location. Surveys have shown that the decline is likely to be a result of increased sediment load from collapsed banks undermined by signal crayfish activity, along with historic modifications that have reduced the natural resilience of the river.

Measures undertaken and planned at this site include:

- Tree planting (started April 2014) 50 Willow whips planted in margins of river.

- Further tree planting (Completed in Feb 2015) 100 Alder, 50 Hawthorn, 25 Oak, 25 Maple and other species, to be planted along this section of river with support from Woodlands Trust.

- Bank stabilization( October 2014) 2 sections of bank stabilazation completed using brushwood bundles, staked into bank.

- Riffle enhancement(started October 2014) 1 riffle enhancement installed in October 2014. (2 Poplar logs staked and tied with fencing wire). 1 riffle ehancement installed in additional location in Feb 2015 (5 Poplar logs 2-4 m in length secured with 20mm re-bar. Logs to be in alternating orientations to maximise variation in scour patterns).

- Channel narrowing (expected 2015)

All work undertaken by Environment Agency with assistance from local volunteers.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Location of riffle enhancement 1 is existing WFD monitoring site for fish. Pre- and post-enhancement survey data will be available.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Bank stab fin.JPG
Defelctor install.JPG
Deflector fin.jpg
Wood pile.JPG
IMG 5019.JPG
PA030216.JPG
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Upper and Bedford Ouse

Subcatchment

River name Ouse (Cosgrove to Newport Pagnell)
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 113113 m <br />0.113 km <br />11,300 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB105033038000



Site

Name Adams Mill
WFD water body codes GB105033038000
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name Ouse (Cosgrove to Newport Pagnell)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 575575 m <br />0.575 km <br />57,500 cm <br />
Project started 2014/09/01
Works started 2014/10/03
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category Less than 1 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency Grant in Aid

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Stakeholder engagement and communication Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency
Works and works supervision Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Invasive species, sediment, Flood protection maintenance works
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank stabilisation
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Increase in-channel hydromorphological diversity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Substrate conditions Yes No Yes Yes No
Quantity & dynamics of flow No No Yes Yes No

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes No No Yes No
[[]] No No No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Habitat mapping No No Yes Yes No


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information