Case study:Ouzel habitat improvement: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 13: Line 13:
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=IMG 4629.JPG
|Picture description=upstream deflector
|Project summary=Section of the Ouzel in Milton Keynes.  The river has modified in the past, for example, channelization works have created a more uniform channel cutting off meanders and reducing hydromorphological diversity in flow and channel bed forms.
|Project summary=Section of the Ouzel in Milton Keynes.  The river has modified in the past, for example, channelization works have created a more uniform channel cutting off meanders and reducing hydromorphological diversity in flow and channel bed forms.


Works over an 80m section included 3 single and 1 paired deflector.  The aim of these works was to increase diversity of flows and bed profile over this section.  It is anticipated that over time, underlying gravels, currently overlaid by fine sediment will be kicked up by localised scour (from deflectors) and also improve habitat quality for invertebrates and for fish spawning.
Works over an 80m section included 3 single and 1 paired deflector.  The aim of these works was to increase diversity of flows and bed profile over this section.  It is anticipated that over time, underlying gravels, currently overlaid by fine sediment will be kicked up by localised scour (from deflectors) and also improve habitat quality for invertebrates and for fish spawning.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Pre-enhancement fish survey undertaken.  Post-enhancement surveys planned.
|Monitoring surveys and results=*Pre-enhancement fish survey undertaken.   
River habitat assessment survey (Central Habitat Assessment)
*Post-enhancement surveys planned.
*River habitat assessment survey (Central Habitat Assessment)
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
Line 38: Line 41:
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Ouzel US Caldecote Mill
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=River Ouzel (Open University)
|Name=River Ouzel (Open University)
Line 51: Line 56:
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m
}}
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=80
|Project started=2014/08/10
|Works started=2014/09/10
|Works completed=2014/09/10
|Project completed=2014/09/10
|Total cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Funding sources=Environment Agency Grant in Aid,
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Environment Agency
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Rob
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Clapham
|Works1 and supervision cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Environment Agency
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Rob
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Clapham
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Environment Agency
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Rob
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Clapham
|Monitoring1 cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Environment Agency
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Rob
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Clapham
}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Planform / Channel pattern=Increase in-channel hydromorphological diversity
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=Quantity & dynamics of flow
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=Substrate conditions
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=Fish
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=Yes
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other response table row
|Element=Habitat mapping
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}

Latest revision as of 13:46, 1 November 2018

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 1' 28.80" N, 0° 42' 51.81" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Rob
Main contact surname Clapham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
upstream deflector

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Section of the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. The river has modified in the past, for example, channelization works have created a more uniform channel cutting off meanders and reducing hydromorphological diversity in flow and channel bed forms.

Works over an 80m section included 3 single and 1 paired deflector. The aim of these works was to increase diversity of flows and bed profile over this section. It is anticipated that over time, underlying gravels, currently overlaid by fine sediment will be kicked up by localised scour (from deflectors) and also improve habitat quality for invertebrates and for fish spawning.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


  • Pre-enhancement fish survey undertaken.
  • Post-enhancement surveys planned.
  • River habitat assessment survey (Central Habitat Assessment)

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Upstream deflector installation
Downstream paired deflectors
Downstream single deflector

File:Ouzel OU plan.pdf

ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Upper and Bedford Ouse

Subcatchment

River name Ouzel US Caldecote Mill
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 183183 m <br />0.183 km <br />18,300 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105033037971



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Woughton on the Green bank stabilization


Site

Name River Ouzel (Open University)
WFD water body codes GB105033037971
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name Ouzel US Caldecote Mill
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Recreational grassland / grazed
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 8080 m <br />0.08 km <br />8,000 cm <br />
Project started 2014/08/10
Works started 2014/09/10
Works completed 2014/09/10
Project completed 2014/09/10
Total cost category Less than 1 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency Grant in Aid

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Post-project management and maintenance Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham
Monitoring Less than 1 k€ Environment Agency Rob Clapham



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Increase in-channel hydromorphological diversity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes No Yes Yes No
Substrate conditions Yes No Yes Yes No

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes No No Yes Yes

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Habitat mapping Yes No Yes Yes No


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information