Case study:Haltwhistle burn; a total catchment approach: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location=54. | |Location=54.98928100000001, -2.436032999999952 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Complete | ||
|Project web site url=www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/44_haltwhistle.pdf | |||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Monitoring, Water quality | |Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Monitoring, Water quality | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
|Partner organisations=Haltwhistle Town Council, Northumberland National Park, Northumberland County Council, Forestry Commission, Natural England, Environment Agency, Newcastle University (NiRES), Hadrian’s Wall Heritage Ltd | |Partner organisations=Haltwhistle Town Council, Northumberland National Park, Northumberland County Council, Forestry Commission, Natural England, Environment Agency, Newcastle University (NiRES), Hadrian’s Wall Heritage Ltd | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=P1080507.JPG | |||
|Picture description=Haltwhistle catchment; beautiful and challenging | |||
|Project summary=Haltwhistle Burn: ‘a total catchment’ approach is a partnership project which will use CRF funds to improve the whole catchment which has suffered the pressures of quarrying, farming, industry and an increasing population. Although the ‘official’ reasons for failure concern pressures on fish according to the criteria provided by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) this project addresses total waterbody issues deriving from a multitude of pressures, each creating ‘sub-lethal’ but chronic stresses. | |Project summary=Haltwhistle Burn: ‘a total catchment’ approach is a partnership project which will use CRF funds to improve the whole catchment which has suffered the pressures of quarrying, farming, industry and an increasing population. Although the ‘official’ reasons for failure concern pressures on fish according to the criteria provided by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) this project addresses total waterbody issues deriving from a multitude of pressures, each creating ‘sub-lethal’ but chronic stresses. | ||
Haltwhistle’s ‘Centre of Britain’ identity, together with attraction of Hadrian’s Wall makes it a po-tentially significant tourism centre, with a focus on both heritage and natural features. There are however significant economic difficulties and youth behaviour issues. Haltwhistle Burn is a central focus and has already attracted works of improvement and interpretation by the Haltwhis-tle Partnership. | Haltwhistle’s ‘Centre of Britain’ identity, together with attraction of Hadrian’s Wall makes it a po-tentially significant tourism centre, with a focus on both heritage and natural features. There are however significant economic difficulties and youth behaviour issues. Haltwhistle Burn is a central focus and has already attracted works of improvement and interpretation by the Haltwhis-tle Partnership. | ||
Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
Tyne Rivers Trust have already carried out geomorphological and habitat assessment of the entire burn, concluding that the ‘catchment approach’ would, by combining the small issues, create a significant benefit for the South Tyne and address the WFD ‘poor status’ classification. | Tyne Rivers Trust have already carried out geomorphological and habitat assessment of the entire burn, concluding that the ‘catchment approach’ would, by combining the small issues, create a significant benefit for the South Tyne and address the WFD ‘poor status’ classification. | ||
Increase awareness of flood issues. <br> | |||
Community engagement with, and responsibility for, the delivery within every strand of this project will be encour-aged. A Tyne Rivers Trust River Watch group has already been set up collating existing local knowledge, carrying out some improvement tasks such as tree planting and to achieve monitoring via fixed point photography, inverte-brate analysis, electro-fishing, and rainfall and flow measurements. The local school has also experiences a ‘Living Rivers’ day with Tyne Rivers Trust exploring their local burn and issues of the wider catchment. They will be further engaged as the project develops. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=This project is still in progress. To date we have restored 45m of channel and 200m of river bank. We have planted 190 trees. We have set up photographic fixed point monitoring sites for the river bank management work and after one season of regrowth the work is doing what we had hoped. We have 3 Riverfly monitors sampling on the burn and to date none of our intervention has had a negative effect. We have completed the preliminary electro-fishing surveys; the next permissible electro-fishing sweason is from July 2014. Another element of this project is also working with the local community to gather information on rainfall, river level, water temperature, turbidity, other chemical water quality measurements and fixed-point photography. | |Monitoring surveys and results=This project is still in progress. To date we have restored 45m of channel and 200m of river bank. We have planted 190 trees. We have set up photographic fixed point monitoring sites for the river bank management work and after one season of regrowth the work is doing what we had hoped. We have 3 Riverfly monitors sampling on the burn and to date none of our intervention has had a negative effect. We have completed the preliminary electro-fishing surveys; the next permissible electro-fishing sweason is from July 2014. Another element of this project is also working with the local community to gather information on rainfall, river level, water temperature, turbidity, other chemical water quality measurements and fixed-point photography. | ||
|Lessons learn=It is impossible to achievement multiple benefits in a hollistic approach project without the support and commitment of partners, local land owners and local residents. We have only managed to achieve this through dedicating time to bringing the right people together and explaining clearly our aims and overlapping benefits. Only then can efective work on the ground begin. It is vital to consider legacy and exit-strategy right from the beginning. Working at the sub-catchment scale cannot be considered in the short-term. Management and maintenance of interventions must be planned for and bought into within the community. | |Lessons learn=It is impossible to achievement multiple benefits in a hollistic approach project without the support and commitment of partners, local land owners and local residents. We have only managed to achieve this through dedicating time to bringing the right people together and explaining clearly our aims and overlapping benefits. Only then can efective work on the ground begin. It is vital to consider legacy and exit-strategy right from the beginning. Working at the sub-catchment scale cannot be considered in the short-term. Management and maintenance of interventions must be planned for and bought into within the community. | ||
Line 50: | Line 56: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study image | {{Case study image | ||
|File name=HCC children build their own river simulator. | |File name=HCC children build their own river simulator p.jpg | ||
|Caption=Children from Haltwhistle Community Campus are inspired to build their own river simulator | |Caption=Children from Haltwhistle Community Campus are inspired to build their own river simulator | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study image | {{Case study image | ||
|File name=HCC river transect measurement. | |File name=HCC river transect measurement p.jpg | ||
|Caption=Children from Haltwhistle Community Campus carry out river transect | |Caption=Children from Haltwhistle Community Campus carry out river transect | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
|File name=Laying trees to protect river bank.JPG | |File name=Laying trees to protect river bank.JPG | ||
|Caption=Laying trees to protect river bank | |Caption=Laying trees to protect river bank | ||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Recording fish data with volunteers.JPG | |||
|Caption=Recording fish data with volunteers | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=River bank collapse p.jpg | |||
|Caption=River bank collapse | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=River bank collapse protected by willow p.jpg | |||
|Caption=River bank collapse protected by willow | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=River Watch Coffee morning fundraiser and info stall.JPG | |||
|Caption=River Watch coffee morning fundraiser and info stall | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Setting up a rainfall gauge p.jpg | |||
|Caption=Setting up a rainfall gauge | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Sharing knowledge of the catchment.jpg | |||
|Caption=Sharing knowledge of the catchment | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=White-clawed crayfish survey workshop.jpg | |||
|Caption=White-clawed crayfish survey workshop | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Working out flow direction for fish easement.JPG | |||
|Caption=Working out flow direction for fish easement | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
Line 69: | Line 107: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=South Tyne | |Subcatchment=Haltwhistle Burn from Source to South Tyne | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Haltwhistle | |Name=Haltwhistle | ||
|WFD water body code=GB103023075570 | |||
|WFD water body name=Haltwhistle Burn from Source to South Tyne | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |Heavily modified water body=No | ||
|Protected species present= | |Site designation=All - multiple designations across the site | ||
|Invasive species present= | |Local site designation=local wildlife site, local geological site | ||
|Protected species present=Yes | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Species=white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes), | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected=18 000 | |||
|Project started=2012/09/17 | |||
|Works started=2013/01/14 | |||
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€ | |Total cost category=100 - 500 k€ | ||
|Total1 cost=425 | |Total1 cost=425 | ||
|Funding sources=Catchment Restoration Funds | |Funding sources=Catchment Restoration Funds | ||
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=10 - 50 k€ | |||
|stk engagement cost=45 | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Tyne Rivers Trust | |||
|Works1 and supervision cost category=100 - 500 k€ | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost=322 | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Tyne Rivers Trust | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Tyne Rivers Trust | |||
|Monitoring1 cost category=1 - 10 k€ | |||
|Monitoring2 cost=7.3 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 88: | Line 143: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |Floodplain / River corridor=Barrier removal, | ||
|Other technical measure=Tree planting, | |||
|Management interventions=Management of organic and inorganic sediments, Improve forest management and agricultural | |Management interventions=Management of organic and inorganic sediments, Improve forest management and agricultural | ||
|Social measures= | |Social measures=Awareness raising, Engagement with schools, | ||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Community engagement | |Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Community engagement, Monitoring via Fixed Point Photography, Invertebrate analysis, Electro-fishing, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
Line 114: | Line 170: | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=research.ncl.ac.uk/haltwhistleburn/ | |||
|Description=Community Based Catchment Management research project | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} | {{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 8 November 2018
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/44_haltwhistle.pdf |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Ceri |
Main contact surname | Gibson |
Main contact user ID | User:Halty |
Contact organisation | Tyne Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://tyneriverstrust.org/ |
Partner organisations | Haltwhistle Town Council, Northumberland National Park, Northumberland County Council, Forestry Commission, Natural England, Environment Agency, Newcastle University (NiRES), Hadrian’s Wall Heritage Ltd |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Haltwhistle Burn: ‘a total catchment’ approach is a partnership project which will use CRF funds to improve the whole catchment which has suffered the pressures of quarrying, farming, industry and an increasing population. Although the ‘official’ reasons for failure concern pressures on fish according to the criteria provided by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) this project addresses total waterbody issues deriving from a multitude of pressures, each creating ‘sub-lethal’ but chronic stresses.
Haltwhistle’s ‘Centre of Britain’ identity, together with attraction of Hadrian’s Wall makes it a po-tentially significant tourism centre, with a focus on both heritage and natural features. There are however significant economic difficulties and youth behaviour issues. Haltwhistle Burn is a central focus and has already attracted works of improvement and interpretation by the Haltwhis-tle Partnership.
Since the 2007 floods in the town, Tyne Rivers Trust has nurtured excellent relationships with agencies and extremely enthusiastic individuals directly connected to their catchment. Whilst the project is not a flood defence project this CRF funding now gives us a clear focus for agency action and direct spending on mitigating excess runoff and pollution.
Tyne Rivers Trust have already carried out geomorphological and habitat assessment of the entire burn, concluding that the ‘catchment approach’ would, by combining the small issues, create a significant benefit for the South Tyne and address the WFD ‘poor status’ classification.
Increase awareness of flood issues.
Community engagement with, and responsibility for, the delivery within every strand of this project will be encour-aged. A Tyne Rivers Trust River Watch group has already been set up collating existing local knowledge, carrying out some improvement tasks such as tree planting and to achieve monitoring via fixed point photography, inverte-brate analysis, electro-fishing, and rainfall and flow measurements. The local school has also experiences a ‘Living Rivers’ day with Tyne Rivers Trust exploring their local burn and issues of the wider catchment. They will be further engaged as the project develops.
Monitoring surveys and results
This project is still in progress. To date we have restored 45m of channel and 200m of river bank. We have planted 190 trees. We have set up photographic fixed point monitoring sites for the river bank management work and after one season of regrowth the work is doing what we had hoped. We have 3 Riverfly monitors sampling on the burn and to date none of our intervention has had a negative effect. We have completed the preliminary electro-fishing surveys; the next permissible electro-fishing sweason is from July 2014. Another element of this project is also working with the local community to gather information on rainfall, river level, water temperature, turbidity, other chemical water quality measurements and fixed-point photography.
Lessons learnt
It is impossible to achievement multiple benefits in a hollistic approach project without the support and commitment of partners, local land owners and local residents. We have only managed to achieve this through dedicating time to bringing the right people together and explaining clearly our aims and overlapping benefits. Only then can efective work on the ground begin. It is vital to consider legacy and exit-strategy right from the beginning. Working at the sub-catchment scale cannot be considered in the short-term. Management and maintenance of interventions must be planned for and bought into within the community.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|