Case study:Highland Water at Warwickslade Lawn: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity | |Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=Sarah | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=Oakley | ||
|Contact organisation= | |Contact organisation=Forestry Commission | ||
|Contact organisation url=www. | |Contact organisation url=www.forestry.gov.uk/ | ||
|Partner organisations=Natural England, Environment Agency, Alaska Environmental Consulting | |||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:New Forest LIFE project | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:New Forest LIFE project | ||
|Multi-site= | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=2009 10 14 (23).JPG | |Project picture=2009 10 14 (23).JPG | ||
|Picture description=Re-meandered section of the restored river | |Picture description=Re-meandered section of the restored river | ||
|Project summary=As part of a EU Life project there was a programme of habitat restoration in SSSIs, into which the Highland Water at Warwickslade fell. The project looked to return the river to it's historical course (determined through the study of historical maps), including re-meandering. A number of work measures were undertaken to reduce the speed of the flow, subsequently reducing bank erosion, and to improve the habitat quality. | |Project summary=As part of a EU Life project there was a programme of habitat restoration in SSSIs, into which the Highland Water at Warwickslade fell. The project looked to return the river to it's historical course (determined through the study of historical maps), including re-meandering. A number of work measures were undertaken to reduce the speed of the flow, subsequently reducing bank erosion, and to improve the habitat quality. | ||
Highland Water is a small headwater sub-catchment (0.25m3) of the Lymington River. Prior to restoration the channel was up to 1.2m deep and 4m wide restricting the natural seasonal flooding of the surrounding forest. The previously wet woodland and mire habitat had dried out and the increased channel size presented a barrier to freely roaming animals across the forest due to channelization in the 1850’s. Construction was carried out using an innovative tramway system to import material to the site, removing the need to drive heavy machinery across the fragile forest environment, which helped to achieve rapid visual recovery once works were complete. | |||
A variety of morphological features and in stream habitats have re-established and floodplain connection has been restored through more regular bank overtopping, which has helped to re-wet the surrounding woodland habitats. These enhancements have been quantified by a recorded improvement in SSSI condition scores for the area. | |||
The work has been well received by the local communities with excellent media coverage. The success of the scheme has facilitated negotiations for future works at other locations across the New Forest. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=2009 10 14 (11).JPG | |||
|Caption=Addition of woody debris to the river to significantly reduce flow velocities, October 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=2009 10 14 (16).JPG | |||
|Caption=To avoid damage to the site in construction, a minature railway track was created to transport materials and machinery. October 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=2009 10 14 (34).JPG | |||
|Caption=channel after restoration | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=S6300226.JPG | |||
|Caption=drainage channel being filled with hoggin and clay mix as flow is transferred to restored channel close by | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Highland Water | |Subcatchment=Highland Water | ||
Line 27: | Line 54: | ||
|WFD (national) typology=Low, Small, Siliceous | |WFD (national) typology=Low, Small, Siliceous | ||
|WFD water body name=Highland Water | |WFD water body name=Highland Water | ||
|Pre-project morphology=Artificial channel, Over deepened, Over-widened, | |||
|Reference morphology=Pool-riffle, Sinuous, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |Heavily modified water body=No | ||
|Site designation=UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest | |Site designation=UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest | ||
|Local site designation=Special Area of Conservation, Ramsar, Special Protection Area, National Park, | |||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |||
|River corridor land use=Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Moorland/heathland, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
Line 39: | Line 71: | ||
|Total1 cost=4 k€ | |Total1 cost=4 k€ | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
|Specific mitigation=Land drainage, | |||
|Other motivation=Bank erosion, Recreation, Landscape enhancement in a heavily protected area | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Planting, Introduction of gravel, | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Re-meandering, | |Planform / Channel pattern=Re-meandering, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
Line 54: | Line 89: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 70: | Line 95: | ||
|Link=www.therrc.co.uk/case_studies/highland%20water%20at%20warwickslade%20lawn.pdf | |Link=www.therrc.co.uk/case_studies/highland%20water%20at%20warwickslade%20lawn.pdf | ||
|Description=River Restoration Centre Case Study | |Description=River Restoration Centre Case Study | ||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.therrc.co.uk/case_studies/longwater%20lawn,%20new%20forest.pdf | |||
|Description=Other SSSI New Forest project - Longwater Lawn and Mallard Wood and Mead, New Forest | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 12:21, 1 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Sarah |
Main contact surname | Oakley |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Forestry Commission |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.forestry.gov.uk/ |
Partner organisations | Natural England, Environment Agency, Alaska Environmental Consulting |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
As part of a EU Life project there was a programme of habitat restoration in SSSIs, into which the Highland Water at Warwickslade fell. The project looked to return the river to it's historical course (determined through the study of historical maps), including re-meandering. A number of work measures were undertaken to reduce the speed of the flow, subsequently reducing bank erosion, and to improve the habitat quality.
Highland Water is a small headwater sub-catchment (0.25m3) of the Lymington River. Prior to restoration the channel was up to 1.2m deep and 4m wide restricting the natural seasonal flooding of the surrounding forest. The previously wet woodland and mire habitat had dried out and the increased channel size presented a barrier to freely roaming animals across the forest due to channelization in the 1850’s. Construction was carried out using an innovative tramway system to import material to the site, removing the need to drive heavy machinery across the fragile forest environment, which helped to achieve rapid visual recovery once works were complete.
A variety of morphological features and in stream habitats have re-established and floodplain connection has been restored through more regular bank overtopping, which has helped to re-wet the surrounding woodland habitats. These enhancements have been quantified by a recorded improvement in SSSI condition scores for the area.
The work has been well received by the local communities with excellent media coverage. The success of the scheme has facilitated negotiations for future works at other locations across the New Forest.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: New Forest LIFE project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|