Case study:Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
   
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 20: Line 13:
|Contact organisation=Ribble Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation=Ribble Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation url=www.ribbletrust.org.uk/
|Contact organisation url=www.ribbletrust.org.uk/
|Partner organisations= RSPB, Durham University, Myerscough College, Environment Agency, Forest of Bowland AONB, Woodland Trust, Forestry Commission, Ribble Valley Borough Council, Pendle Borough Council, Ribble Fisheries  
|Partner organisations=RSPB, Durham University, Myerscough College, Environment Agency, Forest of Bowland AONB, Woodland Trust, Forestry Commission, Ribble Valley Borough Council, Pendle Borough Council, Ribble Fisheries
|Multi-site=Yes
|Multi-site=Yes
|Project picture=Ribble rewettedopengrazingpasture.png
|Picture description=Previously drained rush infested pasture returned to re-wetted open grazing pasture for wading birds and other wetland wildlife. The site now also provides areas that reduce run off rates and trap sediment by retaining water on-site year round.
|Project summary=Diffusing the Issue is a partnership project that will use CRF funds to improve watercourses in areas of the Ribble Catchment that are intensely farmed. Diffuse pollution, poor habitat and obstructions to fish passage are causing certain watercourses in these areas to fail to meet the required standards under the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
|Project summary=Diffusing the Issue is a partnership project that will use CRF funds to improve watercourses in areas of the Ribble Catchment that are intensely farmed. Diffuse pollution, poor habitat and obstructions to fish passage are causing certain watercourses in these areas to fail to meet the required standards under the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
}}
}}
Line 32: Line 27:
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|WFD water body code=GB531207112400
   
|WFD water body name=RIBBLE
   
|Heavily modified water body=No
     
|Protected species present=No
|WFD water body code=
|Invasive species present=No
     
|WFD (national) typology=
     
|WFD water body name=
     
|Pre-project morphology=
     
|Reference morphology=
     
|Heavily modified water body=
     
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
     
|River corridor land use=
     
|Average bankfull channel width category=
     
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project background
{{Project background
|Project started=2012/07/01
|Project completed=2015/03/01
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund
}}
}}
Line 100: Line 54:
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling, Reduce diffuse pollution,
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling, Reduce diffuse pollution,
|Floodplain / River corridor=Weir/barrier removing, Large scale fish easement installation, Small scale easement installation, Tree plantation,
|Floodplain / River corridor=Barrier removal, Small scale easement installation, Tree plantation, Creation of fish passes, Fish habitat restoration,
|Other technical measure=UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, Farm infrastructure interventions,
|Other technical measure=UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, Farm infrastructure interventions,
|Management interventions=Fencing, Non/agricultural business changed its way of working,
|Management interventions=Fencing, Non/agricultural business changed its way of working,
Line 114: Line 68:
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Case study monitoring documents
|Monitoring document=NW006 monitoring framework table.docx
|Description=RRC Monitoring table - Ribble
}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}

Latest revision as of 08:41, 2 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 54' 39.38" N, 2° 21' 45.15" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Jack
Main contact surname Spees
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Ribble Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.ribbletrust.org.uk/
Partner organisations RSPB, Durham University, Myerscough College, Environment Agency, Forest of Bowland AONB, Woodland Trust, Forestry Commission, Ribble Valley Borough Council, Pendle Borough Council, Ribble Fisheries
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Diffusing the Issue in Rural Ribble - River Loud, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Easington, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Skirden Beck, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Stock Beck, Diffusing the Issue in rural Ribble - Swanside
Previously drained rush infested pasture returned to re-wetted open grazing pasture for wading birds and other wetland wildlife. The site now also provides areas that reduce run off rates and trap sediment by retaining water on-site year round.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Diffusing the Issue is a partnership project that will use CRF funds to improve watercourses in areas of the Ribble Catchment that are intensely farmed. Diffuse pollution, poor habitat and obstructions to fish passage are causing certain watercourses in these areas to fail to meet the required standards under the Water Framework Directive (WFD).

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district North West
River basin Ribble

Subcatchment

River name RIBBLE
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID GB531207112400



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Long Preston Deeps Flood Plain Project, Ribble Life Together


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB531207112400
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name RIBBLE
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/07/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/01
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra Catchment Restoration Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident, Riparian development, Barriers to fish migration, Impoundments (not hydropower)
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Channel pattern/planform
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank reprofiling, Reduce diffuse pollution
Floodplain / River corridor Barrier removal, Small scale easement installation, Tree plantation, Creation of fish passes, Fish habitat restoration
Planform / Channel pattern
Other UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, Farm infrastructure interventions
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Fencing, Non/agricultural business changed its way of working
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement
Other Economic benefits


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information