Case study:Wimbledon Common: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039022850 | |||
|WFD water body name=Beverley Brook (Motspur Park to Thames) and Pyl Brook at West Barnes | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
Line 90: | Line 47: | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Toeboard removal | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Toeboard removal | ||
|Social measures= | |Social measures=Improved public access, Community Education, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 08:04, 6 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Potential for toe-board removal; habitat management to encourage marginal vegetation and in-stream habitats; regrading/realignment of the channel to improve in channel processes and aquatic margins. Improve ecological value of the Beverley Brook through the site; provide improved public access, recreational and educational opportunities.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anton Crescent Wetlands Regeneration, Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme, Barn Elms Sports Ground, Barn Elms Wetland Centre, South West London, Barnes Common, Barnes Common improvements, Beverley Brook Flow control structures, Beverley Brook d/s of Rock’s Lane, Beverley Park, Cuddington Park... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|