Case study:Hampton Court Palace: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(16 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 14: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality, Urban | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=Rebecca | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=Law | ||
|Contact organisation=Thames Landscape Strategy | |||
|Contact organisation url=thames-landscape-strategy.org.uk/what-we-do/projects/ | |||
|Partner organisations=Thames Landscape Strategy, Thames 21, Historic Royal Palaces | |||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Home Park Water Meadows | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Reedbed creation | |Project picture=Hampton court-14.jpg | ||
|Picture description=Hampton Court from the River Thames. (Philip Carey 2010) | |||
|Project summary=Reedbed creation, profiling of river bank, tree management, installation of eel passes and stocking of fish in adjacent ponds at Hampton Court Palace, Home Park Paddocks. Main reasons for enhancement were habitat creation, landscape and aesthetics. Riverbank enhancement, and potential to demonstrate traditional management methods with modern knowledge and technology to show improvement to flood meadow function and water quality. | |||
The final part of the Home Park project completed using funding from CPAF15/16 was partnership working between Thames Landscape Strategy, Thames21, and Historic Royal Palaces. Three new eel passes were constructed and installed on the Longford River to enable the passage of elvers from the Thames into ponds on site, with urther marginal planting installed on the Long Water Canal.There was the use of Shire Horses, cutting of bankside vegetation and extraction of timber for senestive land mangement practices, and the removal of a number of self-set Norway maple trees from the banks of the Longford River to reduce shading of the river system and to allow marginal vegetation to establish,and restocking crucian carp. | |||
The project involved local communities and volunteers to help with monitoring the success of the project, and promote awareness of the Maidenhead to Teddington Catchment. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Monitoring of nitrates and phosphates and surveying of wildlife on going. To be undertaken by Historic Royal Palace Staff, local conservation groups, volutneers, and local community trained by Thames21. | |||
|Lessons learn=Project timing is essential to maximize benefit. When to cut vegetation, when to plant, what time is best to carry out re-profiling to limit disturbance,when it is best to work with local communites, schools in particular and those with more fixed schedules, and the fact that projects must be allowed to be flexible enough to alter perimeters should the need arise within these timings. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 28: | Line 34: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name= | |Name=Home Park | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023232 | |||
|WFD water body name=Thames (Egham to Teddington) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected=25 m | |Reach length directly affected=25 m | ||
|Project started=2009/01/01 | |Project started=2009/01/01 | ||
|Works completed= | |Works completed=2016/04/01 | ||
|Total cost category= | |Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | ||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Historic Royal Palace, Thames Landscape Strategy | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Thames Landscape Strategy, Thames21 | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Thames Landscape Strategy | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Historic Royal Palaces | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Thames21 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 88: | Line 57: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Habitat creation, Reedbed creation | |||
|Social measures=Aesthetics | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Social measures= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 15:33, 6 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rebecca |
Main contact surname | Law |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Thames Landscape Strategy |
Contact organisation web site | http://thames-landscape-strategy.org.uk/what-we-do/projects/ |
Partner organisations | Thames Landscape Strategy, Thames 21, Historic Royal Palaces |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Reedbed creation, profiling of river bank, tree management, installation of eel passes and stocking of fish in adjacent ponds at Hampton Court Palace, Home Park Paddocks. Main reasons for enhancement were habitat creation, landscape and aesthetics. Riverbank enhancement, and potential to demonstrate traditional management methods with modern knowledge and technology to show improvement to flood meadow function and water quality.
The final part of the Home Park project completed using funding from CPAF15/16 was partnership working between Thames Landscape Strategy, Thames21, and Historic Royal Palaces. Three new eel passes were constructed and installed on the Longford River to enable the passage of elvers from the Thames into ponds on site, with urther marginal planting installed on the Long Water Canal.There was the use of Shire Horses, cutting of bankside vegetation and extraction of timber for senestive land mangement practices, and the removal of a number of self-set Norway maple trees from the banks of the Longford River to reduce shading of the river system and to allow marginal vegetation to establish,and restocking crucian carp.
The project involved local communities and volunteers to help with monitoring the success of the project, and promote awareness of the Maidenhead to Teddington Catchment.
Monitoring surveys and results
Monitoring of nitrates and phosphates and surveying of wildlife on going. To be undertaken by Historic Royal Palace Staff, local conservation groups, volutneers, and local community trained by Thames21.
Lessons learnt
Project timing is essential to maximize benefit. When to cut vegetation, when to plant, what time is best to carry out re-profiling to limit disturbance,when it is best to work with local communites, schools in particular and those with more fixed schedules, and the fact that projects must be allowed to be flexible enough to alter perimeters should the need arise within these timings.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Broom Road Recreation Ground, Chertsey meads, Hurst Park, Teddington Wharf, The Barge Walk, Hampton Court
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|