Case study:Crane Park: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
   
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 18: Line 11:
|Main contact forename=Sarah
|Main contact forename=Sarah
|Main contact surname=Woodcock
|Main contact surname=Woodcock
|Contact organisation url=cranevalley.org.uk/
|Partner organisations=Crane Valley Partnership
|Partner organisations=Crane Valley Partnership
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Cvp logo website.png
|Project summary=Water vole Capital Works (Survey and physical works); reedbed creation; tree work and coppicing; toe-board removal. BAP habitat creation and improvement in river marginal vegetation for water voles, birds, invertebrates and fish.
|Project summary=Water vole Capital Works (Survey and physical works); reedbed creation; tree work and coppicing; toe-board removal. BAP habitat creation and improvement in river marginal vegetation for water voles, birds, invertebrates and fish.
}}
}}
Line 30: Line 25:
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|WFD water body code=GB106039023030
   
|WFD water body name=Crane (including part of the Yeading Brook)
   
|Heavily modified water body=No
     
|Protected species present=No
|WFD water body code=
|Invasive species present=No
     
|WFD (national) typology=
     
|WFD water body name=
     
|Pre-project morphology=
     
|Reference morphology=
     
|Heavily modified water body=
     
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
     
|River corridor land use=
     
|Average bankfull channel width category=
     
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project background
{{Project background
Line 85: Line 37:
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Hydromorphological quality elements=
|Biological quality elements=Fish, Invertebrates, Vertebrates
   
   
     
|Biological quality elements=
     
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
     
|Specific mitigation=
     
|Other motivation=
     
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Floodplain / River corridor=Reedbed creation, Tree management
   
|Other technical measure=UK BAP habitat creation/restoration,
   
     
|Floodplain / River corridor=
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
     
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

Latest revision as of 13:48, 2 January 2019

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 26' 35.94" N, 0° 22' 39.05" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Sarah
Main contact surname Woodcock
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://cranevalley.org.uk/
Partner organisations Crane Valley Partnership
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Water vole Capital Works (Survey and physical works); reedbed creation; tree work and coppicing; toe-board removal. BAP habitat creation and improvement in river marginal vegetation for water voles, birds, invertebrates and fish.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Crane (including part of the Yeading Brook)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 5151 m <br />0.051 km <br />5,100 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039023030



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Big Yellow, Cranford Park Phase 2, Hospital Bridge Road, Mill Road Weir, Re-connecting Meanders at Cranebank on the River Crane, The Mid River Crane - Aquatic Refuge Identification Plan


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106039023030
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Crane (including part of the Yeading Brook)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2008/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Biffaward secured, with potential for greatly increasing the scale of the project through an HLF bid - SEE BELOW

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish, Invertebrates, Vertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Reedbed creation, Tree management
Planform / Channel pattern
Other UK BAP habitat creation/restoration
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information