Case study:Medland Close, River Wandle: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|Partner organisations=Wandle Trust, Wandle Piscators, London Borough of Sutton | |Partner organisations=Wandle Trust, Wandle Piscators, London Borough of Sutton | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Clear the scrub and some canopy to improve light penetration to the river. Flow & width adjustments for wider areas to create viable pool-riffle system. Despite trout spawning in the area, some habitat is degraded and silt covers gravel. | |Project summary=Clear the scrub and some canopy to improve light penetration to the river. Flow & width adjustments for wider areas to create viable pool-riffle system. Despite trout spawning in the area, some habitat is degraded and silt covers gravel.<br> | ||
Planned and in discussion for funding and delivery <br> | |||
Funding - Environment Agency Or Wild Trout Trust (Cinderella Project) | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023460 | |||
|WFD water body name=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
Line 91: | Line 44: | ||
|Project started=2009/01/01 | |Project started=2009/01/01 | ||
|Total cost category=1 - 10 k€ | |Total cost category=1 - 10 k€ | ||
|Funding sources=Environment Agency | |Funding sources=Environment Agency, Wild Trout Trust | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements= | |Hydromorphological quality elements=Quantity & dynamics of flow, Substrate conditions, Width & depth variation | ||
|Biological quality elements=Fish | |||
|Biological quality elements= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Tree management | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of pools and riffles | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 12:55, 1 November 2018
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Bella |
Main contact surname | Davies |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Wandle Trust |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Wandle Trust, Wandle Piscators, London Borough of Sutton |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Clear the scrub and some canopy to improve light penetration to the river. Flow & width adjustments for wider areas to create viable pool-riffle system. Despite trout spawning in the area, some habitat is degraded and silt covers gravel.
Planned and in discussion for funding and delivery
Funding - Environment Agency Or Wild Trout Trust (Cinderella Project)
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beddington Park, Beddington Park Enhancements, Boulder Pool and Plough Lane, Durand Close, EDF Weir removal, Eel Pass over tilting weir at Ravensbury Park, Garratt Park, Hackbridge Restoration, Hackbridge weir notch, King Georges Park... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|