Case study:Mill Green: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Planned | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Fisheries | |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Joanna | |Main contact forename=Joanna | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |Contact organisation=Environment Agency | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | |Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | ||
|Partner organisations= | |Partner organisations=Environment Agency, London Borough of Sutton, | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Bank and bed naturalisation; introduction of meanders; associated wetland creation; inclusion of riffles and pools. The Beddington branch is a straight, concrete channel through an area of amenity grassland. There is an opportunity to create a natural river through the area of open space with associated habitat creation. The benefits would also include slowing the flow into the Wandle at Poulter park. | |Project summary=Bank and bed naturalisation; introduction of meanders; associated wetland creation; inclusion of riffles and pools. The Beddington branch is a straight, concrete channel through an area of amenity grassland. There is an opportunity to create a natural river through the area of open space with associated habitat creation. The benefits would also include slowing the flow into the Wandle at Poulter park. | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023460 | |||
|WFD water body name=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project_background | {{Project_background | ||
Line 161: | Line 111: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements= | |Hydromorphological quality elements=Quantity & dynamics of flow, Channel pattern/planform | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Removing of concrete structures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland, Habitat creation | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of meanders, Creation of pools and riffles | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 15:30, 6 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, London Borough of Sutton |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Bank and bed naturalisation; introduction of meanders; associated wetland creation; inclusion of riffles and pools. The Beddington branch is a straight, concrete channel through an area of amenity grassland. There is an opportunity to create a natural river through the area of open space with associated habitat creation. The benefits would also include slowing the flow into the Wandle at Poulter park.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beddington Park, Beddington Park Enhancements, Boulder Pool and Plough Lane, Durand Close, EDF Weir removal, Eel Pass over tilting weir at Ravensbury Park, Garratt Park, Hackbridge Restoration, Hackbridge weir notch, King Georges Park... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|