Case study:Dovers Corner: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Planned | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Economic aspects | |Themes=Economic aspects, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Jennifer | |Main contact forename=Jennifer | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Ingrebourne | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106037028130 | |||
|WFD water body name=Ingrebourne | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project_background | {{Project_background | ||
Line 158: | Line 108: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Specific mitigation=Urbanisation | |||
|Specific mitigation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling | ||
|Social measures=Improved public access | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Economic benefits | |||
|Social measures= | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 27 October 2015
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 31' 14.19" N, 0° 11' 13.31" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Jennifer |
Main contact surname | Norman |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Riverbank enhancements and naturalisation. The bank is currently degraded, base and in poor condition. Some sections are also toe-boarded and over-shaded. The section could be improved to increase habitat diversity and the quality of the river corridor. This is of particular relevance to support future populations of water voles along the river.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Frog Island, Rainham Creek Tidal Sluice Removal, Rainham Creek and Thames Confluence
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|