Case study:Crane Park: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 14: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Planned | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Sarah | |Main contact forename=Sarah | ||
|Main contact surname=Woodcock | |Main contact surname=Woodcock | ||
|Contact organisation url=cranevalley.org.uk/ | |||
|Partner organisations=Crane Valley Partnership | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Cvp logo website.png | |||
|Project summary=Water vole Capital Works (Survey and physical works); reedbed creation; tree work and coppicing; toe-board removal. BAP habitat creation and improvement in river marginal vegetation for water voles, birds, invertebrates and fish. | |Project summary=Water vole Capital Works (Survey and physical works); reedbed creation; tree work and coppicing; toe-board removal. BAP habitat creation and improvement in river marginal vegetation for water voles, birds, invertebrates and fish. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 24: | Line 21: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Crane (including part of the Yeading Brook) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023030 | |||
|WFD water body name=Crane (including part of the Yeading Brook) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2008/01/01 | |||
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=Biffaward secured, with potential for greatly increasing the scale of the project through an HLF bid - SEE BELOW | |||
|Project started= | |||
|Total cost category= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Biological quality elements=Fish, Invertebrates, Vertebrates | |||
|Biological quality elements= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Reedbed creation, Tree management | |||
|Other technical measure=UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Other technical measure= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 13:48, 2 January 2019
Location: 51° 26' 35.94" N, 0° 22' 39.05" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Sarah |
Main contact surname | Woodcock |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | http://cranevalley.org.uk/ |
Partner organisations | Crane Valley Partnership |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Water vole Capital Works (Survey and physical works); reedbed creation; tree work and coppicing; toe-board removal. BAP habitat creation and improvement in river marginal vegetation for water voles, birds, invertebrates and fish.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Big Yellow, Cranford Park Phase 2, Hospital Bridge Road, Mill Road Weir, Re-connecting Meanders at Cranebank on the River Crane, The Mid River Crane - Aquatic Refuge Identification Plan
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|