Case study:Chase Nature Reserve: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 14: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Becca | |Main contact forename=Becca | ||
Line 20: | Line 14: | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | |Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Chase Nature Reserve.jpg | |||
|Project summary=Creation of a back water and enhance the river bank by creating wet margins. Fencing of new features to protect from heavy horse grazing. Contaminated silt issues in pond / backwater. The field survey suggests that the reserve supports a population of water voles. | |Project summary=Creation of a back water and enhance the river bank by creating wet margins. Fencing of new features to protect from heavy horse grazing. Contaminated silt issues in pond / backwater. The field survey suggests that the reserve supports a population of water voles. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 26: | Line 21: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Rom / Beam (Including Bourne Brook, from Watton's Green to confluence with Ravensbourne) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106037028120 | |||
|WFD water body name=Rom / Beam (Including Bourne Brook, from Watton's Green to confluence with Ravensbourne) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project_background | {{Project_background | ||
Line 159: | Line 104: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements= | |Specific mitigation=Pollution incident, Riparian development | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Substrate conditions | |||
|Biological quality elements=Vertebrates | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Specific non-synthetic pollutants, Specific synthetic pollutants | |||
|Biological quality elements= | |Other motivation=Landscape enhancement | ||
|Physico-chemical quality elements= | |||
|Other motivation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Fencing | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of backwater | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 12:19, 27 October 2015
Location: 51° 33' 30.77" N, 0° 10' 23.23" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Becca |
Main contact surname | O’Shea |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Creation of a back water and enhance the river bank by creating wet margins. Fencing of new features to protect from heavy horse grazing. Contaminated silt issues in pond / backwater. The field survey suggests that the reserve supports a population of water voles.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Colliers Row, King Georges Playing Field, Raphael Park, Roneo Corner
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|