Case study:Morden Hall: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 14: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Alex | |Main contact forename=Alex | ||
|Main contact surname=Draper | |Main contact surname=Draper | ||
|Contact organisation=London Wildlife Trust | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary= | |Project picture=Morden Hall.jpg | ||
|Project summary=Restore more natural channel with range of in channel features and backwaters, also new small side channel to avoid garden area which will become formalised. Improvement of 800m of river, through naturalisation of bank and creation of bankside features. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 24: | Line 20: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023460 | |||
|WFD water body name=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected= | |Reach length directly affected=600 m | ||
|Project started=2008/01/01 | |||
|Works completed=2009/01/01 | |||
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | |||
|Project started= | |Funding sources=Landfill (Viridor) CTP from The National Trust | ||
|Works completed= | |||
|Total cost category= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Specific mitigation=Riparian development | |||
|Specific mitigation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of backwater | |||
|Management interventions=Garden area | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
|Management interventions= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 10:50, 5 June 2017
Location: 51° 24' 0.01" N, 0° 11' 3.37" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Alex |
Main contact surname | Draper |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | London Wildlife Trust |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Restore more natural channel with range of in channel features and backwaters, also new small side channel to avoid garden area which will become formalised. Improvement of 800m of river, through naturalisation of bank and creation of bankside features.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beddington Park, Beddington Park Enhancements, Boulder Pool and Plough Lane, Durand Close, EDF Weir removal, Eel Pass over tilting weir at Ravensbury Park, Garratt Park, Hackbridge Restoration, Hackbridge weir notch, King Georges Park... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|