Case study:Goresbrook Park: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
   
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 13: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Complete
|Status=Planned
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Lynn
|Main contact forename=Lynn
Line 19: Line 13:
|Contact organisation=Kinnear Landscape Architects
|Contact organisation=Kinnear Landscape Architects
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=High density housing development 350 acres with measures to conserve and enhance biodiversity in green spaces – 40% of site – including along watercourse corridors. Barking riverside redevelopment
|Project picture=Goresbrook Park.jpg
|Picture description=Flowering field with a dancing and dipping row of willow trees
|Project summary=Deculverting through Parloes Park and naturalisation. Bank improvements and creation of features, creation of associated wetland areas in Goresbrook Park. Flooding of Parsloes occurs during intense rainfall events, the manholes blow their lids. Flood risk could be massively improved. The Gores brook is culverted through Parloes, so this would perhaps have priority.
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery}}
Line 25: Line 21:
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=Mayes Brook East/Gores Brook
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|WFD water body code=GB106037028140
   
|WFD water body name=Mayes Brook East/Gores Brook
   
|Heavily modified water body=No
     
|Protected species present=No
|WFD water body code=
|Invasive species present=No
     
|WFD (national) typology=
     
|WFD water body name=
     
|Pre-project morphology=
     
|Reference morphology=
     
|Heavily modified water body=
     
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
     
|River corridor land use=
     
|Average bankfull channel width category=
     
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project_background
Line 158: Line 104:
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Hydromorphological quality elements=
|Specific mitigation=Flood risk management, Riparian development
   
   
     
|Biological quality elements=
     
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
     
|Specific mitigation=
     
|Other motivation=
     
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling, Deculverting
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland
   
     
|Floodplain / River corridor=
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
     
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

Latest revision as of 10:25, 22 June 2016

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 32' 19.92" N, 0° 8' 33.97" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Lynn
Main contact surname Kinnear
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Kinnear Landscape Architects
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Flowering field with a dancing and dipping row of willow trees

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Deculverting through Parloes Park and naturalisation. Bank improvements and creation of features, creation of associated wetland areas in Goresbrook Park. Flooding of Parsloes occurs during intense rainfall events, the manholes blow their lids. Flood risk could be massively improved. The Gores brook is culverted through Parloes, so this would perhaps have priority.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin Roding, Beam and Ingrebourne

Subcatchment

River name Mayes Brook East/Gores Brook
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 4343 m <br />0.043 km <br />4,300 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106037028140



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Goresbrook and Ship and Shovel Sewer, Parsloes Park


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106037028140
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Mayes Brook East/Gores Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 700 m0.7 km <br />70,000 cm <br />
Project started 2008/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management, Riparian development
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank reprofiling, Deculverting
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetland
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information