Case study:Elmbridge Meadows: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Marie-Claire | |Main contact forename=Marie-Claire | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Hogsmill | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039017440 | |||
|WFD water body name=Hogsmill | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected= | |Reach length directly affected=1000 m | ||
|Funding sources=Funding source unknown | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
| | |Specific mitigation=Flood risk management | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Flow velocities | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish | |||
|Other motivation=Community demand, Recreation | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|Other motivation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Social measures=Aesthetics, Recreation | |||
|Social measures= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 07:46, 6 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 23' 32.76" N, 0° 16' 23.42" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Marie-Claire |
Main contact surname | Edwards |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Royal Borough of Kingston |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Potential to slow the flow into the Hogsmill STW. This would improve recreational amenity, fisheries and biodiversity. It would also improve sustainable flood risk management. A section of the Hogsmill that is a straight channel through an area of amenity grassland.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Bonesgate Phase 2, Hogsmill River Connectivity Project, Hogsmill Sewage Treatment Works phase 1, Moor Lane Allotments, River Hogsmill Restoration Project, Three Bridge, Kingston
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|